2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported leisure time physical activity: a useful assessment tool in everyday health care

Abstract: BackgroundThe individual physical activity level is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death, as well as a possible target for improving health outcome. However, today´s widely adopted risk score charts, typically do not include the level of physical activity. There is a need for a simple risk assessment tool, which includes a reliable assessment of the level of physical activity. The aim of this study was therefore, to analyse the association between the self-reported levels of physical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, moderate to vigorous physical activity was lower for patients in our study compared to the general Danish population (21.6 vs. 29.2 %) [31]. However, the 2 % of the patients reporting physical activity at the highest level (level IV) was consistent with levels reported in studies carried out in the general population [32][33][34]. Thus, patients with RA may differ from the general population in particular through behavior that is more sedentary or at a low level of physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, moderate to vigorous physical activity was lower for patients in our study compared to the general Danish population (21.6 vs. 29.2 %) [31]. However, the 2 % of the patients reporting physical activity at the highest level (level IV) was consistent with levels reported in studies carried out in the general population [32][33][34]. Thus, patients with RA may differ from the general population in particular through behavior that is more sedentary or at a low level of physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This risk of social desirability bias is well known when using self-report measures of physical activity and sedentary behavior. However, the Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire developed by Saltin and Grimby has proven robust and independent of the context and been found to be appropriate for estimating cardiovascular morbidity [32,58] risk of death in a large Danish population-based study [59]. Nevertheless, for more precise measurement of the detailed physical activity level and patterns, studies including objective measures (e.g., accelerometers) are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire and The SaltinGrimby Physical Activity Level Scale were used to evaluate physical activity and [20,21]. The latter consists of one question about physical activity the last three months with four answer choices.…”
Section: Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If your activity varies greatly try to estimate an average.' The answering categories were as follows: The Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale has been shown to have a high validity and reliability [24], being associated to objective measures of activity, cardiovascular risk factors [25,26], as well as morbidity [27,28] and mortality [29], and has been used in >500,000 patients in clinical studies [24]. The questionnaire referred to the last week before the patient answered.…”
Section: Self-assessment Of Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%