2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported interoceptive deficits in eating disorders: A meta-analysis of studies using the eating disorder inventory

Abstract: This meta-analysis is the first to confirm that large interoceptive deficits occur in a variety of eating disorders and crucially, in those who have recovered. These deficits may be useful in identifying and distinguishing eating disorders. Future research needs to consider both objective and subjective measures of interoception across different types of eating disorders and may fruitfully examine interoception as a possible endophenotype and target for treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(73 reference statements)
6
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For researchers, distilling particular elements shared between autism and other conditions associated with NSSI would be valuable. Poor interoceptive awareness, for instance, is shared by people with eating disorders [110], autistic people [111], and self-harmers and people who report suicide ideation or attempts [112]. In this study, suicide-attempters were less likely to ignore or distract themselves from painful sensations and were less able to regulate distress by paying attention to bodily sensations [112].…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Studymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For researchers, distilling particular elements shared between autism and other conditions associated with NSSI would be valuable. Poor interoceptive awareness, for instance, is shared by people with eating disorders [110], autistic people [111], and self-harmers and people who report suicide ideation or attempts [112]. In this study, suicide-attempters were less likely to ignore or distract themselves from painful sensations and were less able to regulate distress by paying attention to bodily sensations [112].…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Studymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This possible primacy of DIF in predicting overeating has recently been supported by results from experimental studies. They have shown that DIF may foster the tendency to misinterpret the visceral sensations related to hunger and satiety, thus leading to maladaptive eating patterns (Ernst et al, ; Herbert, Herbert, & Pollatos, ; Jenkinson, Taylor, & Laws, ; Kano, Hamaguchi, Itoh, Yanai, & Fukudo, ; Nakao, Barsky, Kumano, & Kuboki, ; Scarpazza, Làdavas, & di Pellegrino, ). Recent neuroscientific findings suggest that obesity may be associated with hypersensitivity to interoceptive signals of hunger and insensitivity to interoceptive signals of satiety (Simmons & DeVille, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One previous study has used a heartbeat discrimination task, finding no differences between people with AN and HC (15). By contrast, research on interoceptive sensibility in AN consistently suggests that people with AN self-report a lack of confidence in their ability to detect their internal stimuli compared to HC (16). It should be noted that these previous interoceptive sensibility studies have primarily used the interoceptive subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%