2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported harm of adolescent peer aggression in three world regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings from the present study confirm that school bullying is a frequent aspect of Italian students' lives, with approximately one in two reporting being bullied and over one in ten reporting that they were seriously bullied. The incidence of severely bullied students was in line with other international reports [3], while the incidence of victimization was higher in our study than in other studies [2,43,44]. This result can be explained by the fact that we have decided to include all those students who reported having suffered at least two episodes of bullying in the last two months as occasional victims, using a broad criterion to include all the victimized students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The findings from the present study confirm that school bullying is a frequent aspect of Italian students' lives, with approximately one in two reporting being bullied and over one in ten reporting that they were seriously bullied. The incidence of severely bullied students was in line with other international reports [3], while the incidence of victimization was higher in our study than in other studies [2,43,44]. This result can be explained by the fact that we have decided to include all those students who reported having suffered at least two episodes of bullying in the last two months as occasional victims, using a broad criterion to include all the victimized students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, our data were based on a rich dataset that enabled the assessment of different aspects, not only of social support but of psychosomatic symptoms as well. Additionally, it should be noted that in our study, bullying perpetration was measured through questions, which were preceded by the definition of bullying [59], but such aggression behavior experiences that were outside the scope of the bullying definition could also have been harmful [75]. Therefore, it should be taken under consideration that HBSC bullying perpetration definition has not yet been validated as a direct measure of bullying, despite its wide usage in empirical studies across multiple countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, there is a discrepancy between the included studies on study design, definition of constructs (e.g., peer victimization vs. bullying), and measures for clinical assessment. Based on the definition of constructs, many studies referred indistinctly to bullying and peer victimization, in contradiction with the recent literature [4] that distinguishes the two constructs based on the asymmetric power present in the relationship between bully and victim. This did not allow a quantitative analysis of the results.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most severe manifestation of peer victimization is bullying, characterized by an asymmetric power relationship between bully and victim, which may be physical or psychological [4]. Another recent form of victimization is cyberbullying, which the aggressions is entirely online and using electronic media [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%