2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(00)70027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported disability following distal radius fractures: The influence of hand dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
34
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential predictors included (1) baseline variables representing patient characteristics or fracture characteristics before surgery and (2) postsurgical variables. The baseline variables included age, 10,31 education, 32 whether the dominant hand was fractured, 33 workers' compensation status (yes/no), 32 and fracture classification (AO classification). 34 The postoperative variables included volar tilt angle, 10 radial height, 10,34 -36 radial inclination, 36 and total incongruity (step ϩ gap).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential predictors included (1) baseline variables representing patient characteristics or fracture characteristics before surgery and (2) postsurgical variables. The baseline variables included age, 10,31 education, 32 whether the dominant hand was fractured, 33 workers' compensation status (yes/no), 32 and fracture classification (AO classification). 34 The postoperative variables included volar tilt angle, 10 radial height, 10,34 -36 radial inclination, 36 and total incongruity (step ϩ gap).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome variables were based on data from the MHQ, which has been shown to be a reliable and valid outcome tool for the upper extremity. Outcome questionnaires have been used in other studies 5,6,10,32,33,38,39,41 evaluating DRF, and these questionnaires provide a robust and sensitive dependent variable for constructing a predictive model that cannot be assessed via objective measures alone. 42,43 All of the patients in this series were treated with a VLPS, which has become a popular method of treatment for inadequately reduced DRFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is evaluated, Mc Queen et al 18 have reported that the average age was 69 in their study, Beaula et al 19 have reported that the average age was 51.2 in their study. In our study, the average age was 44.2±8.8 for both groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The outcome variables were based on the data from the Gartland and Werley and the Modified Mayo scoring systems, both of which had been shown to be reliable and valid outcome tools for the upper extremity. The outcome questionnaires had been used in other studies [3,11,[17][18][19][20][21][22] in evaluating DRFs, and these questionnaires had provided robust and sensitive dependent variables for constructing a predictive model that could not be accessed via objective measures alone [8,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%