2015
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐reported diabetes self‐management competence and support from healthcare providers in achieving autonomy are negatively associated with diabetes distress in adults with Type 1 diabetes

Abstract: AimTo investigate the associations of self‐perceived competence in diabetes management and autonomy support from healthcare providers with diabetes distress in adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus that is not optimally controlled [HbA1c ≥ 64 mmol/mol (8.0%)].MethodsThis cross‐sectional study comprised blood sampling and three self‐report questionnaires, the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale, the Perceived Competence in Diabetes Scale and a measure of autonomy support by healthcare providers, the Health Care Clim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 14 In a cross-sectional study, HCPs being autonomy supportive were associated with the perceived level of diabetes distress mediated through the perceived level of diabetes competence. 23 In the current study, and incongruent with prior research on the GSD approach, 18 19 there was no change in HCP autonomy support (HCCQ) and level of diabetes competence (PCDS). However, GSD increased autonomous motivation (TSRQ autonomy) and reduced diabetes distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 14 In a cross-sectional study, HCPs being autonomy supportive were associated with the perceived level of diabetes distress mediated through the perceived level of diabetes competence. 23 In the current study, and incongruent with prior research on the GSD approach, 18 19 there was no change in HCP autonomy support (HCCQ) and level of diabetes competence (PCDS). However, GSD increased autonomous motivation (TSRQ autonomy) and reduced diabetes distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Further details on inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined elsewhere. 23 A prestudy power calculation for a t-test assuming a 0.05 significance level and a power of 0.8 expecting 25% dropout and a difference of 0.6% change in HbA 1c (SD 1.3) between groups led to 218 participants needed to include. Expected change in HbA 1c was based on clinical relevance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures that capture PROs can fill these important information gaps. A variety of validated measures (including surveys and questionnaires) of some PROs for youth and adults with type 1 diabetes are available and are used in clinical studies, including those for diabetes distress ( 76 ) and fear of hypoglycemia ( 77 ). Work to further develop and validate tools and measures for diabetes health-related quality of life is ongoing.…”
Section: Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health literacy, patient empowerment, and a positive patient attitude are vital to achieving good outcomes and are associated with significantly less diabetes-related distress and perceived stigmatization and improved quality of life. [ 16 17 18 19 ] A well-motivated individual feels more confident and in control of every situation, including social interactions and interpersonal relationships. Therefore, health-care providers should encourage patient education and patient autonomy.…”
Section: P Sychosocial C Onsiderations mentioning
confidence: 99%