2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
129
3
15

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
129
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies evident that students who self-regulate their learning perform better and learn effectively than their counterparts with worse self-regulatory learning behavior Cleary & Chen, 2009;Dresel & Haugwitz, 2008;Jarvela & Jarvenoja, 2011;Kistner, Rakoczy, & Otto, 2010;Schunk & Zimmerman, 2008;Zimmerman, 2008). Specifically, self-regulated students actively set goals and shift approaches flexibly (Wolters, 2011), apply appropriate learning strategies (Harris, Friedlander, Sadler, Frizzelle, & Graham, 2005;Meltzer, 2007), monitor their performance by seeking feedback on it and making appropriate adjustments in the future (Harris et al, 2005), evaluate their academic progress (De Bruin, Thiede, & Camp, 2011), seek out additional resources when needed to master content (Clarebout, Horz, & Schnotz, 2010;De Bruin et al, 2011), pursuit positive learning environment and manipulate them to satisfy their needs (Kolovelonis, Goudas, & Dermitzaki, 2011;Labuhn, Zimmerman, & Hasselhorn, 2010), and have higher academic self-efficacy (Labuhn et al, 2010).…”
Section: Self-regulation In Learning From a Self-determination Perspementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies evident that students who self-regulate their learning perform better and learn effectively than their counterparts with worse self-regulatory learning behavior Cleary & Chen, 2009;Dresel & Haugwitz, 2008;Jarvela & Jarvenoja, 2011;Kistner, Rakoczy, & Otto, 2010;Schunk & Zimmerman, 2008;Zimmerman, 2008). Specifically, self-regulated students actively set goals and shift approaches flexibly (Wolters, 2011), apply appropriate learning strategies (Harris, Friedlander, Sadler, Frizzelle, & Graham, 2005;Meltzer, 2007), monitor their performance by seeking feedback on it and making appropriate adjustments in the future (Harris et al, 2005), evaluate their academic progress (De Bruin, Thiede, & Camp, 2011), seek out additional resources when needed to master content (Clarebout, Horz, & Schnotz, 2010;De Bruin et al, 2011), pursuit positive learning environment and manipulate them to satisfy their needs (Kolovelonis, Goudas, & Dermitzaki, 2011;Labuhn, Zimmerman, & Hasselhorn, 2010), and have higher academic self-efficacy (Labuhn et al, 2010).…”
Section: Self-regulation In Learning From a Self-determination Perspementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptions of high value are associated with the acquisition of new knowledge (Guy, Cornick, & Beckford, 2015). Students who perceive mathematics as useful are more motivated to learn, practice, study, and employ key self-regulatory strategies than students who perceive mathematic as less useful (Cleary & Chen, 2009;Kajamies, Vauras, & Kinnunen, 2010;Villavicencio & Bernardo, 2013;Zimmerman & Schunk, 2008).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on literature, students' discipline act as moderator variable in students' perceptions of learning environment, motivation to learn, and using learning strategies (Cleary & Chen, 2009;Crede & Philips 2012;Judd, 2009;Ghosh2011;Kauffman, 2004;Artino, 2009). Therefore, the level of students' motivation and learning strategies are possible to be somewhat different for various classes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%