2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self‐Determination, and Will?

Abstract: The term autonomy literally refers to regulation by the self. Its opposite, heteronomy, refers to controlled regulation, or regulation that occurs without self-endorsement. At a time when philosophers and economists are increasingly detailing the nature of autonomy and recognizing its social and practical significance, many psychologists are questioning the reality and import of autonomy and closely related phenomena such as will, choice, and freedom. Using the framework of self-determination theory (Ryan & De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
784
1
48

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,157 publications
(899 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(87 reference statements)
22
784
1
48
Order By: Relevance
“…If given a choice, many clients would select the goal that best fits their circumstances and acceptance of a client's choice is likely to result in a more successful outcome (Adamson & Sellman, 2001). This is also supported by several psychological theories, such as Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 2001) or the Selfdetermination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2006) which stress the importance of autonomous regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…If given a choice, many clients would select the goal that best fits their circumstances and acceptance of a client's choice is likely to result in a more successful outcome (Adamson & Sellman, 2001). This is also supported by several psychological theories, such as Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 2001) or the Selfdetermination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2006) which stress the importance of autonomous regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…DeCharms, 1968), particularly the emphasis on experiencing oneself as the locus of causality for one's own behaviours. The need for autonomy is regarded as one of the most fundamental needs (Sheldon, Elliot, Kim, & Kasser, 2001), and a necessity and requirement to be fulfilled in order for intrinsic motivation to emerge or be sustained (Ryan & Deci, 2006). With respect to work settings, a number of studies support the propositions that autonomy-supportive (rather than controlling) work environments promote need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation (see Gagné & Deci, 2005 for a review).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, in a manipulative study with students who were preparing for teaching, the perception of autonomy correlated significantly with interest, satisfaction and engagement (which included attention, effort and persistence in the task), and performance level (Reeve & Jang, 2006). Conversely, evidence has revealed that when exclusively using controlled motivation, the students regularly tend to avoid challenges, to lose initiative, to be content with mere reproductions of the contents or simply to reach the end of the task, without concern for the quality (Lepper & Hoddell, 1989;Reeve, Bolt, & Cai, 1999;Ryan & Deci, 2006). In summary, according to these authors, the students in this condition learn less, especially when the learning is complex and requires deep processing.…”
Section: Consequences Of Autonomous Motivation In the Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%