2006
DOI: 10.1177/004005990603800407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction for Expository Text Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, learners were provided brief instructions, an example model, and text boxes to implement the strategy. Existing research establishes effective strategy instruction includes attention to procedural and conditional knowledge and instruction over time (e.g., Hilden and Pressley 2007;Mason et al 2006). In the absence of such extensive strategy instruction, our findings suggested more benefit from student-selected strategies than from the selected prompted strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, learners were provided brief instructions, an example model, and text boxes to implement the strategy. Existing research establishes effective strategy instruction includes attention to procedural and conditional knowledge and instruction over time (e.g., Hilden and Pressley 2007;Mason et al 2006). In the absence of such extensive strategy instruction, our findings suggested more benefit from student-selected strategies than from the selected prompted strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is critical for comprehension that learners are able to both identify and generate MIs. In addition to foundational research that has established the viability of MI as a comprehension strategy, recent research has further explored the strategy as a component of comprehensive, multi-component comprehension strategies (e.g., Armbruster et al 1987;Gajria et al 2007;Jitendra et al 2000;Mason et al 2006;Mastropieri et al 2003;Meyer et al 1980Meyer et al , 2002Stevens 1988;Therrien et al 2006;Williams 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Text processing studies have consistently demonstrated that explicitly teaching students how to identify and effectively communicate (i.e., orally or in writing) the main idea or summarize major points of a text significantly improves reading comprehension among middle grade students with learning disabilities or difficulties (Berkeley, Matropeori, & Scruggs, 2011; Gajria, Jitendra, Sood, & Sacks, 2007; Jitendra, Hoppes, & Zim, 2000; Mason, Meadan, Hedan, & Corso, 2006; Solis et al, 2012). The majority of interventions have utilized strategy instruction related to main idea or summarization as a means for increasing engagement with text, organization of information, integration of information in text with prior knowledge, and monitoring of comprehension.…”
Section: Content and Text-processing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transfer best happens when teachers carefully plan, use, and reflect on the best way to introduce content reading strategies to students (Mason et al 2006). The state's and districts' professional development meetings gave teachers opportunities to collaboratively plan lessons and write content units that featured the recommended reading strategies.…”
Section: Content Reading Strategies: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%