Although political and marketing analysts commonly describe political candidates as brands, the conceptualization of political candidates as brands within academic research and popular culture is uncommon. This paper presents empirical evidence in support of viewing candidates as such. Using data from a nationwide study that measures the self concept of Mexican voters and their perceived images of the presidential candidates in Mexico's 2006 election, the paper demonstrates that voters see themselves and each candidate as a distinct brand. Furthermore, this view of a voter's self-brand influences his or her perception of a political candidate's brand image. The academic and managerial implications of these findings are discussed. KEYWORDS brand image, self-referencing, political candidates, political brands During the last two decades, the cost of elections has escalated throughout the world. The total cost of the 2008 United States election has been estimated by the Center for Responsive Politics at $5.3 billion, $2.4 billion for the presidential race alone. The Electoral Commission-an independent party funding watchdog in the United Kingdom-has estimated a total expenditure of almost £1.5 billion for the 2010 general election. According to the Mexican Federal Electoral Institute, $1 billion was budgeted for Mexico's 2006 presidential election. Equally, the marketing of political candidates has become a multimillion dollar business in the past decade. According to CNN, 1 more than $580 million was spent on advertising by all political candidates and parties in the 2008 United States election. In comparison, according to TNS Media Intelligence, during the first quarter of 2010, the top five advertisers in the United States (Procter & Gamble, AT&T, General Motors, Verizon, and Pfizer) spent at least $400 million each to promote their products and services. Considering that these companies advertise multiple brands or services, the $310 million spent by then Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and $134 million spent by Republican counterpart John McCain are considerable advertising budgets from any perspective. The marketing budgets of political candidates thus make it seem that now more than ever ''political leadership. .. is driven not only by ideology but also by marketing'' (Newman 1994:6). With so much money involved and so much at stake-in terms of the influence exerted by the winning candidate on the future of the United States, and on the world in terms of economy and geopolitical positioning-trying to understand the market determinants of a presidential election in any country is now more than ever of great interest for politicians, political marketers, and marketing academicians. Furthermore, understanding voter behavior, such as how voters evaluate candidates and the voting shortcuts they take, has provided valuable insights for political marketing given the fact that voters, in general, do not share political commentators' and academics' fascination with politics (Harris and Lock 2010). This st...