2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE): Predictive utility and reliability across interview and self-report administrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions nine and 10 are scored zero, two or four. The maximum score of AUDIT is 40 and a score equal or greater than 8 means high risk for alcoholism (10). This questionnaire was not applied in day of trauma because alcoholic conditions could have interfered in answering it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions nine and 10 are scored zero, two or four. The maximum score of AUDIT is 40 and a score equal or greater than 8 means high risk for alcoholism (10). This questionnaire was not applied in day of trauma because alcoholic conditions could have interfered in answering it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two scores were generated, one for the approximate fi rst fi ve times of drinking (the SRE5) and the other the number of drinks for effects averaged across the fi rst fi ve times, the period of heaviest drinking, and the most recent 3 months (the SRET) (Ray et al, 2011;Schuckit et al, 1997b). This instrument, with a Cronbach's α > .90 and 12-month to 5-year reliabilities between .6 and .8, recorded the number of standard drinks required for fi rst feeling effects, slurring speech, impairing coordination, and passing out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRE score for any time frame is the sum of the number of drinks reported across the range of effects actually experienced divided by the number of effects reported. This questionnaire has a literature-based Cronbach's α of .97, has retest reliabilities as high as .8, correlates with the alcohol challenge in predicting future heavy drinking at about .60, and performs similarly to the alcohol challenge-based LR when incorporated in SEM analyses (Daeppen et al, 2000;Ray et al, 2011;Schuckit et al, 2009bSchuckit et al, , 2010Schuckit et al, , 2011aTrim et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%