Self‐rated preparedness of Australian prevocational hospital doctors for emergencies

Abstract

Objective:To determine perceived preparedness of Australian hospital-based prevocational doctors for resuscitation skills and management of emergencies, and to identify differences between doctors who perceive themselves well prepared and those who perceive themselves poorly prepared for emergencies, in demographics and exposure to desired learning methods. Methods:Questionnaire consisting of a mix of graded Likert scales and free-text answers distributed to 36 Australian hospitals for secondary distribution to hospital medical officers. Results:From 2607 questionnaires posted, 470 (18.1%) were returned. Thirty-one per cent (95% confidence interval [CI] 26-35%) felt well prepared for resuscitation and management of emergencies, 41% (CI 37-45%) felt adequately prepared and 28% (CI 24-32%) felt they were not well prepared. Those who felt well prepared reported that they had experienced more exposure to a range of educational methods, including consultant contact, supervisor feedback, clinical skills, high fidelity simulator sessions and unit meetings. Well-prepared and poorly prepared doctors had similar opinions of the usefulness of various learning methods, but the poorly prepared group more frequently expressed a desire for increased exposure to contact with registrars and consultants, clinical skills sessions and hospital and unit meetings. There were no differences in gender, age or country of origin (Australia vs international medical graduates) between those who felt well or poorly prepared. Conclusions:Many prevocational hospital doctors feel inadequately prepared for the management of emergencies. Perceived preparedness is associated with more exposure to particular educational activities. Increasing exposure to learning of emergencies in undergraduate and prevocational years could reduce the number of junior doctors who feel poorly prepared for emergencies.

Well prepared for work? Junior doctors' self-assessment after medical education

“…Feedback of superiors, as well as living without a partner did indeed turn out to be associated with the feeling of preparedness, demonstrating the complex interactions which have to be considered when using self-assessments. Feedback was also identified as influencing factor on preparedness by other authors [29], stressing the importance and the benefit of the direct interaction between superiors and junior doctors, e. g. during "bedside teaching". Nevertheless, the inclusion of the above mentioned confounders did not alter the effect of deficits in the three identified core competencies on the feeling of preparedness, which underlines their independent influence.…”

Designing and implementing a skills program using a clinically integrated, multi-professional approach: using evaluation to drive curriculum change

“…The results of program evaluation indicated that the workshops’ processes and format have been valued by students, have enhanced student ability and preparedness to perform several of the procedural skills and also increased the amount of clinical experience they obtained. While relying on self-ratings of preparedness as a key evaluation measure may be a limitation, others have shown a link between poor perceived preparedness and limited exposure to clinical experience 25. Additionally, while students are supervised when performing procedures, introducing structured summative assessment has proved difficult, thus limiting outcome evaluation of the program.…”

The Emergency Medicine Capacity Assessment Study: Anticipated impact of a major increase in intern numbers in Australian ED

“…A structured interview by telephone following consent of individual doctors was used to maximize response rate. This method was chosen over questionnaire methodology that we have found, in previous studies to yield a low response rate with this participant type 8–10 …”

“…This method was chosen over questionnaire methodology that we have found, in previous studies to yield a low response rate with this participant type. [8][9][10] For the larger Australian States, participants were drawn from a stratified sample of two city, two metropolitan and two provincial hospitals of each State/ Territory. Hospitals were selected based on the advice of the relevant postgraduate medical councils who were asked to nominate hospitals with ED and prevocational doctors 'representative' of the state for each category (city, metropolitan, provincial).…”