2014
DOI: 10.1111/jere.12029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-rated Health Status of Japanese and Europeans in Later Life: Evidence from JSTAR and SHARE

Abstract: Using panel data from two surveys in Japan and Europe, we examine the comparability of the self-rated health of the middle-aged and elderly across Japan and the European countries and the survey periods. We find that a person's own health is evaluated on different standards (thresholds) across the different countries and survey waves. When evaluated on common thresholds, the Japanese elderly are found to be healthier than their counterparts in the European countries. At the individual level, reporting biases l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In adjusting for reporting biases due to income and A-P-C when responding to SRH categories, we used the empirical method described by Fujii et al [ 24 ] and Jürges [ 30 ], which consisted of constructing a normalized health index ranging from 0 to 1, in which 0 represented the worst health condition and 1 represented the best health condition across income and A-P-C. The health index was based on objective information on health problems, such as physical and mental health problems that had been diagnosed by a physician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In adjusting for reporting biases due to income and A-P-C when responding to SRH categories, we used the empirical method described by Fujii et al [ 24 ] and Jürges [ 30 ], which consisted of constructing a normalized health index ranging from 0 to 1, in which 0 represented the worst health condition and 1 represented the best health condition across income and A-P-C. The health index was based on objective information on health problems, such as physical and mental health problems that had been diagnosed by a physician.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, although the majority of studies have used self-rated health (SRH) as an indicator for examining SES-related health differences, few studies have adjusted for reporting biases caused by heterogeneity, or different thresholds across populations with differing demographic or socioeconomic status when they evaluate their own health. According to a review by Fujii et al [ 24 ], threshold levels in SRH depend on sex, age, education, time points, and income. As a result, reporting biases might have caused A-P-C differences in SES gaps in health reported in some studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study examines both physical (e.g., self-reports of functional impairment/disability) and cognitive impairments (e.g., memory tests conducted by interviewers). The former are considered as a quasi-objective indicator of health, which arguably provides a more accurate assessment than SRH [ 23 ] and is likely less sensitive to the cross-cultural biases identified for SRH [ 24 26 ]. By contrast, the latter are objective measures of health that are less subject to individual recall bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRH is related to socioeconomic factors such as age, gender, educational level, standard of living, and economic activities [6], and emotional states and health-related lifestyle [6][7]. Obesity is a factor affecting health status, as obese people tend to have lower SRH scores [8][9]. Physical activity is another factor influencing health status [4,6,9], and little or no physical activity can lead to premature death [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of studies on depression and physical activity in relation to SRH in many countries, most of them rely on cross-sectional survey data [1,[5][6][7], showing limitations in identifying the cause-effect relationship [2,8,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%