2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self perception and facial emotion perception of others in anorexia nervosa

Abstract: Background: Whether individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) are able to accurately perceive emotions from faces of others is unclear. Furthermore, whether individuals with AN process images of their own face differently to healthy individuals has thus far not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate facial affect processing and the processing of one’s own face through measures of emotion identification, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and eyetracking.Methods: Twenty-fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative words concerning interpersonal relationships were associated with increased activation in the superior temporal gyrus in AN [55]. Patients with AN also showed increased activation in the fusiform gyrus in an implicit facial expression task [32] and increased activity in right inferior and middle temporal gyri and right lingual gurys in response to own face stimuli [56]. In AN-REC, an emotional conflict task resulted in less activation in the bilateral amygdala, hippocampus and basal ganglia [57] while another study found no significant differences between AN-REC and healthy controls during viewing of fearful and happy faces [58].…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative words concerning interpersonal relationships were associated with increased activation in the superior temporal gyrus in AN [55]. Patients with AN also showed increased activation in the fusiform gyrus in an implicit facial expression task [32] and increased activity in right inferior and middle temporal gyri and right lingual gurys in response to own face stimuli [56]. In AN-REC, an emotional conflict task resulted in less activation in the bilateral amygdala, hippocampus and basal ganglia [57] while another study found no significant differences between AN-REC and healthy controls during viewing of fearful and happy faces [58].…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are as follows: (1) hyperscanning (i.e. increased fixations of shorter duration) during two different tasks of face and body viewing, respectively (Phillipou et al, 2015a(Phillipou et al, , 2015b; (2) shorter prosaccade latencies (Phillipou et al, 2016); (3) increased inhibitory errors on a memory-guided saccade (oculomotor delayed response) task (Phillipou et al, 2016); and (4) increased rate of saccadic intrusions, called square wave jerks, during a fixation task, which in combination with anxiety levels were identified as a potential biomarker of AN (Phillipou et al, 2014b).These findings have encouraged the development of a hypothesis for a novel neurobiological underpinning to AN, and have implicated a brain region and neurotransmitter system in the aetiology of the illness that have been previously overlooked. Although further research is required to gain a better understanding of how these findings relate to AN symptomatology, they do emphasise the need for more high-quality studies aimed at elucidating the role of specific brain regions and neurotransmitter systems in this illness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are as follows: (1) hyperscanning (i.e. increased fixations of shorter duration) during two different tasks of face and body viewing, respectively (Phillipou et al, 2015a(Phillipou et al, , 2015b; (2) shorter prosaccade latencies (Phillipou et al, 2016); (3) increased inhibitory errors on a memory-guided saccade (oculomotor delayed response) task (Phillipou et al, 2016); and (4) increased rate of saccadic intrusions, called square wave jerks, during a fixation task, which in combination with anxiety levels were identified as a potential biomarker of AN (Phillipou et al, 2014b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors refer to their recent work (Toh et al, 2017a) as supporting two patterns in BDD: those who focus on perceived flaws and those who avoid them. Yet, at the same time, they note that in their study in AN there was an avoidance of salient facial features (Phillipou et al, 2015). Nevertheless, heterogeneity of BDD behaviors seems plausible; Grocholewski et al, 2012) previously speculated three groups: those with high number of fixations and lower total duration time, those who gaze longer per fixation at each misperceived defect, and those who avoid looking at such areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%