2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-perceived foot function and pain in children and adolescents with flexible flatfeet – Relationship between dynamic pedobarography and the foot function index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides new insights in diagnostical approaches by using pedobarography which helps to dynamically assess foot alignment. In addition to clinical examination pedobarography improves the three-dimensional understanding of FFF and its treatment [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Comparable studies to discuss the observation in the context of actual literature are rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study provides new insights in diagnostical approaches by using pedobarography which helps to dynamically assess foot alignment. In addition to clinical examination pedobarography improves the three-dimensional understanding of FFF and its treatment [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Comparable studies to discuss the observation in the context of actual literature are rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard assessment includes clinical and radiological examination. Modern technology such as digital pedobarography has helped to improve understanding and treatment of the deformity [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic pedobarography evaluates these variables at specific moments in gait phases. Additionally, it provides the foot contact pattern, plantar pressure distribution such as peak pressure time or pressure-time integrals, and the center of pressure (CoP) trajectories [4,38]. Hellstrom et al [39] have proposed a division into the spatiotemporal variables (step and stride length, stride width, step time, speed, ground contact duration, and cadence) and the force and pressure variables (peak forces and pressures, mean plantar pressure, CoP, speed of CoP shift, contact region, force-time integral, arch index, and the foot posture).…”
Section: Pedobarographic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although often neglected as being of little medical importance, foot disorders may be crippling at any age, adversely affect the quality of life, and hinder the musculoskeletal development and socioemotional development of children [1,2]. Examples are the flat foot or platypodia, one of the commonest disorders [3,4], and more serious conditions such as a discrepancy in leg length, causing a differential overload of both legs, which destabilize posture and may lead to disability [5]. The diagnostic methods for foot disorders are not standardized or unified, appear uncertain and troublesome, and are often guided empirically or by healers' experience rather than being evidence-based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Footprint analysis and FPI-6 are the most widely used clinical methods for assessment of static foot posture, 10 , 14 however, disagreement persists over whether footprint analysis can evaluate foot posture. Some studies even doubt whether a footprint can accurately represent MLA, 22 , 23 however, several investigations have shown that footprint indices correlate with radiographic measures. Kanatli et al 24 reported that footprint analysis is as accurate as radiologic measurements, Villarroya et al 25 found a significant correlation between CA and Chippaux-Smirak index (CSI) methods and radiography-based talus–first metatarsal (T1MA) and calcaneal inclination angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%