2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self–other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates' job satisfaction and turnover intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(157 reference statements)
3
93
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there was a point after which high and aligned perceptions caused rather decrease than improvement in team learning, which contradicts Hypotheses 1 and 2. Curvilinear relationships have previously been reported between leaders' and subordinates' ratings of empowering leadership and leader effectiveness (Amundsen & Martinsen, 2014). However, the authors' interpretation that this was due to how successful leaders were avoiding to outperform others is hardly transferable to organizational learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, there was a point after which high and aligned perceptions caused rather decrease than improvement in team learning, which contradicts Hypotheses 1 and 2. Curvilinear relationships have previously been reported between leaders' and subordinates' ratings of empowering leadership and leader effectiveness (Amundsen & Martinsen, 2014). However, the authors' interpretation that this was due to how successful leaders were avoiding to outperform others is hardly transferable to organizational learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Supportive, fair, and empowering leadership are examples of constructive leadership behaviors that may protect against and alleviate psychological distress (Amundsen and Martinsen 2014;Britt et al 2004;Finne et al 2014). In contrast, laissez-faire leadership may represent a form of destructive leadership that may be less adaptive after a traumatic incident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception was Variable 1 (p-value ϭ 0.470 Ͼ 0.05) of transformational leadership (leader's revelation of thoughts and feelings in his/her group) where both leaders and employees proceeded to low ratings. Amundsen and Martinsen (2014) mentioned that they are often hard-working individuals who maintain pleasant relationships with their supervisors, and it is important that they be made more aware of their qualities as employees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%