Abstract:Abstract. In this work, we propose a method for self-organized adaptive task partitioning in a swarm of robots. Task partitioning refers to the decomposition of a task into less complex subtasks, which can then be tackled separately. Task partitioning can be observed in many species of social animals, where it provides several benefits for the group. Selforganized task partitioning in artificial swarm systems is currently not widely studied, although it has clear advantages in large groups. We propose a fully … Show more
“…From matrix D, the dependency pairs are (1, 3), (3,4), (4,6), (5, 7), (6, 5), (7,8), (10,9), (9,2). These pairs are combined, and we end up with two task sequences that must be followed: 3,4,6,5,7,8] s2 = [10,9,2].…”
Section: The Scattered Permutations (Sp) Al-gorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural task partitioning is created where one group of ants specializes in cutting the leaves (see fig. 1), and another group in transporting the fallen leaves back to the nest [4]. The sequential dependency comes from the fact that the leaves must be cut before transporting.…”
Task partitioning in multi-robot systems involves breaking down tasks or partitioning them into smaller tasks tackled by different robots in the system. Some of the benefits of this approach is less interference among the individual agents as they become more segregated, an improved scalability, and an improved transport efficiency. This approach allows for a better overall group performance, leads to specialization and aids in parallel task execution. In this paper, a new problem involving self-organized task allocation for partially sequential tasks in a two-robot environment is investigated. This partially sequential nature comes from the fact that some tasks are to be executed in a specific order while others can be executed in any order. The two robots are nonidentical. The first is equipped to do all the necessary computations and it has the ability to decide on the optimal order of executing the tasks, let's call him "Brain"; while the other has a set of simple behaviors that it keeps following at all times, let's call him "Pinky". There is no explicit communication between the two robots; instead, indirect communication is achieved through the concept of stigmergy.
“…From matrix D, the dependency pairs are (1, 3), (3,4), (4,6), (5, 7), (6, 5), (7,8), (10,9), (9,2). These pairs are combined, and we end up with two task sequences that must be followed: 3,4,6,5,7,8] s2 = [10,9,2].…”
Section: The Scattered Permutations (Sp) Al-gorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural task partitioning is created where one group of ants specializes in cutting the leaves (see fig. 1), and another group in transporting the fallen leaves back to the nest [4]. The sequential dependency comes from the fact that the leaves must be cut before transporting.…”
Task partitioning in multi-robot systems involves breaking down tasks or partitioning them into smaller tasks tackled by different robots in the system. Some of the benefits of this approach is less interference among the individual agents as they become more segregated, an improved scalability, and an improved transport efficiency. This approach allows for a better overall group performance, leads to specialization and aids in parallel task execution. In this paper, a new problem involving self-organized task allocation for partially sequential tasks in a two-robot environment is investigated. This partially sequential nature comes from the fact that some tasks are to be executed in a specific order while others can be executed in any order. The two robots are nonidentical. The first is equipped to do all the necessary computations and it has the ability to decide on the optimal order of executing the tasks, let's call him "Brain"; while the other has a set of simple behaviors that it keeps following at all times, let's call him "Pinky". There is no explicit communication between the two robots; instead, indirect communication is achieved through the concept of stigmergy.
“…These concepts of swarm robotics have various applications such as task allocation [6], military operations, search and rescue victims, lawn mowing and sweeping, space mission, operations like enclosing an invader [8], area exploration and coverage [7] etc. Existing task allocation techniques [6,9,10] partition the swarm into several groups and dynamically allocate each group of robots to multiple tasks. They may use balanced partitioning techniques [1][2][3] that partitions n number of robots in k-size balanced groups.…”
This piece of work studies the partitioning problem on independently operating swarm of autonomous mobile robots and devises algorithms for unbalanced partitioning in a distributed computing environment. The robots considered here are all identical and are very simple and weak. There is no central control over the robots and the robots do not communicate among themselves. Each robot executes the same algorithm based on their local information. This paper frames the algorithms for unbalanced partitioning by sorting the robots based on their ranking and then allocating them in different groups based on their ranks, such that N robots are divided into K unbalanced groups of unequal robots in each group. This paper also presents the performance based analysis of the un-balanced algorithm U_PART over the balanced algorithm and examines their effects via different examples through 50 separate test cases. It also tries to bring out the shortcomings of the proposed U_PART algorithm and proposes another alternative approach towards un-balanced partitioning to overcome the limitation of the U_PART algorithm.
“…At an intermediate location robots who have finished the first sub-task transfer the resource to robots waiting to start the second. In some studies, this transfer is directly between robots [10], [12], [14], whereas others make use of a cache in which resources can be deposited after completion of the first sub-task, regardless whether a robot is ready to start the second [9], [13], [15]. These studies, however, all use a single source and nest, and hence resources have a single entry-, exchange-and exit-point.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current studies of sequential task allocation either focus on ensuring optimal usage of resources (e.g. robots, time) on each sub-task globally [10]- [12], or on optimal switching between sequential and non-sequential processing of tasks [9], [13] (when coordination for partitioning tasks incurs an overhead). However, a problem not addressed so far is distributed sequential task allocation: the optimal use of fractions of resources locally in a distributed problem.…”
Abstract-When designing a practical swarm robotics system, self-organized task allocation is key to make best use of resources. Current research in this area focuses on task allocation which is either distributed (tasks must be performed at different locations) or sequential (tasks are complex and must be split into simpler sub-tasks and processed in order). In practice, however, swarms will need to deal with tasks which are both distributed and sequential. In this paper, a classic foraging problem is extended to incorporate both distributed and sequential tasks. The problem is analysed theoretically, absolute limits on performance are derived, and a set of conditions for a successful algorithm are established. It is shown empirically that an algorithm which meets these conditions, by causing emergent cooperation between robots can achieve consistently high performance under a wide range of settings without the need for communication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.