2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2018.8647894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Organized Low-Power IoT Networks: A Distributed Learning Approach

Abstract: Enabling large-scale energy-efficient Internet-ofthings (IoT) connectivity is an essential step towards realization of networked society. While legacy wide-area wireless systems are highly dependent on network-side coordination, the level of consumed energy in signaling, as well as the expected increase in the number of IoT devices, makes such centralized approaches infeasible in future. Here, we address this problem by selfcoordination for IoT networks through learning from past communications. To this end, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Note that this assumes that an underlying Poisson distribution governs the packet generation process -which is a fairly common assumption in Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) networks [4], [12], [13], [15], [18], [19]-. We extend the procedure of [5] by, instead of averaging all the observed inter-arrival times for a node i, considering a moving average that assigns exponentially larger weights to recent samples.…”
Section: Network Throughputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Note that this assumes that an underlying Poisson distribution governs the packet generation process -which is a fairly common assumption in Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) networks [4], [12], [13], [15], [18], [19]-. We extend the procedure of [5] by, instead of averaging all the observed inter-arrival times for a node i, considering a moving average that assigns exponentially larger weights to recent samples.…”
Section: Network Throughputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on distributed learning for radio resources allocation in LoRaWAN had recourse to Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem [13], [14]. Each end-device is considered as an intelligent agent that chooses a given SF and/or channel to improve the success transmission rate [13] or the reliability and energy-efficiency tradeoff [14], through an adequate reward process. In [13], the authors assumed that all end-devices use the same SF and adopted the stochastic MAB algorithm to determine the frequency selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an assumption is impractical in reality due to the mutual coupling between multiple intelligent end-devices. The work in [14] has presented stochastic and adversarial based distributed learning algorithms for resource allocation in an IoT network. However, the capture effect and inter-SF interference are overlooked.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on distributed selection of radio resources in LoRaWAN had recourse to the Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem [6], [7]. Each end-device is considered as an intelligent agent that chooses a given SF and/or channel to minimize its cumulative regret in comparison with the best fixed allocation that renders the highest reward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an assumption is impractical in LoRa network due to the mutual coupling between multiple intelligent end-devices. The work in [7] has explored adversarial MAB for resource allocation in an IoT network. However, the capture effect and inter-SF interference were not taken into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%