Self-organized bodies, between Politics and Biology. A political reading of Aristotle’s concepts of Soul and Pneuma

Abstract

The idea of a self-organized system brings both political and biological discourses together, for they both aim at explaining how a certain compound can achieve self-unity out of plurality. Whereas biological metaphors in politics have been much examined, political metaphors in biology have not. In this paper I intend to show how political metaphors can enlighten biological discourses, taking the work of Aristotle as a case-study. The relationship between the main elements of a living-body could be better understood within a political scheme: the soul rules over the body through pneuma, its prime minister. This scheme entails, thus, to re-examine Aristotle's definition of soul in the light of the key concept of pneuma, and to replace the hylemorphic explanation with a triadic one. On the one hand, soul is the entelecheia of the body as it keeps both the form and the end of the organism, which is its unity. On the other hand, the moving-efficacious principle that performs unity by circulating through the body, and by linking the body to its environment is pneuma. Therefore, the political formula: "the king does not govern" could shed light upon the structure of the living body: whereas the soul rules the body, pneuma governs it. Although Aristotle does not 1 This paper was written during my Post-doctoral Fellowship at the Institut für Hermeneutik of the University of Bonn, sponsored by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung.

The issue of social control in late modernity: alienation and narrativity

“…We live in a palliative society, victims of algophobia (Han 2021), which only treats pain from the point of view of analgesia and not from the point of view of dealing with it and its possible meaning by integrating it, even if only as a mystery, as part of one's own life narrative (Grassi 2020). See, for example, how Lola López Mondéjar, a psychoanalyst psychologist, describes the individual adapted to today's system: "The hyper-adapted contemporary individual identifies with infantile invulnerability and omnipotence, denying the more fragile aspects of their self, which ultimately go unnoticed, inventing an illusion of invulnerability to be able to live, one which makes them highly malleable."…”

Persona in spe. Anthropological and Theodical Aspects of Hope

“…At the level of nature, hope is most noticeable where life presents itself (Grassi 2020). A special hope related to the duration and fulfilment of life functions, despite all the hardships that nature poses in abundance, is embedded in a significant way in the very phenomenon of life itself.…”