IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.1991.155208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-organization via competition, cooperation and categorization applied to extended vehicle routing problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although neural network models can handle spatial relationships among vertices, they cannot easily handle side constraints, such as capacity constraints or time windows, that prevent a pure spatial interpretation of the problem. Therefore, the literature on NNs applications to vehicle routing problems is scant, except for a special class of models, known as deformable templates, like the elastic net and the self-organizing map [28,29,50,55,75,86]. The work of Ghaziri [28,29] will be used in the following to illustrate how a deformable template, here a self-organizing map, can be applied to the standard VRP with capacity constraints.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although neural network models can handle spatial relationships among vertices, they cannot easily handle side constraints, such as capacity constraints or time windows, that prevent a pure spatial interpretation of the problem. Therefore, the literature on NNs applications to vehicle routing problems is scant, except for a special class of models, known as deformable templates, like the elastic net and the self-organizing map [28,29,50,55,75,86]. The work of Ghaziri [28,29] will be used in the following to illustrate how a deformable template, here a self-organizing map, can be applied to the standard VRP with capacity constraints.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the three SOM based approaches of Ghaziri (1996), Modares et al (1999), and Schwardt and Dethloff (2005) which provide comparative studies, and report results for the well known Christofides et al (1979) benchmark problems, denoted CMT problems below. Other neural network versions (Gomes and Von Zuben 2002;Matsuyama 1991;Schumann and Retzko 1995;Vakhutinsky and Golden 1994) are quite algorithmically similar or clearly worse performing. Only Ghaziri (1996) addresses the timeduration version of VRP and solves almost all the corresponding CMT test cases.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Contextmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Few works were carried out trying to extend SOM, or elastic nets, to the VRP. As far as we know, the most recent approaches are Ghaziri (1996), Gomes and Von Zuben (2002), Matsuyama (1991), Modares et al (1999), Schumann and Retzko (1995), Schwardt and Dethloff (2005) and Vakhutinsky and Golden (1994). They are generally based on a complex modification of the internal learning law, altered by problem dependant penalties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Few works were carried out trying to extend SOM, or elastic nets, to address the VRP. From our knowing, the most recent approaches are [12], [13], [21], [24], [29], [31]. They are generally based on a complex modification of the internal learning law and winner selection, altered by problem dependant penalties.…”
Section: Experiments Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we known, only [12], [24] have made significant use of publicly available test problems which are the Christofides, Mingozzi and Toth (CMT) [4] benchmark test set. Other approaches as [13], [21], [29], [31] are referred as less performing or are hard to evaluate since they have typically used just a few and specific test problems. All these approaches are based on a complex modification of the SOM internal learning law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%