2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.103384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-optimization of resilient topologies for fallible multi-robots

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where c l is the center of each measurement, e.g., c l = 0 for zero mean measurement error ϵ (8). The corresponding variance is denoted σ 2 G,l , where in practice is a constant value σ 2 G,l = σ 2 G for all l measurements.…”
Section: Spatial Trend Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where c l is the center of each measurement, e.g., c l = 0 for zero mean measurement error ϵ (8). The corresponding variance is denoted σ 2 G,l , where in practice is a constant value σ 2 G,l = σ 2 G for all l measurements.…”
Section: Spatial Trend Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference from the ordinary kriging lies in the mean value of the random field, which is not assumed to be constant. More specifically, provided measurements Y at locations x ∈ R 2 the random field is described by (8). We use a linear unbiased estimator, (25) where…”
Section: Spatial Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In real-world applications, data transmission over cyber networks and information shared between agents could become susceptible to not only adverse and malicious threats but also attacks that would crucially compromise or even destroy a networked robotic system [17], [18]. Although multi-agent systems are advantageous in various tasks with redundancy and scalability, the issues of actuator faults, fallible robots, and vulnerable communications have recently attracted significant attention [14], [19]- [24]. Connectivity preservation with respect to robot failures was addressed by [19], where a self-optimization of resilient topologies and an experimental validation were provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although multi-agent systems are advantageous in various tasks with redundancy and scalability, the issues of actuator faults, fallible robots, and vulnerable communications have recently attracted significant attention [14], [19]- [24]. Connectivity preservation with respect to robot failures was addressed by [19], where a self-optimization of resilient topologies and an experimental validation were provided. In [21], a distributed H ∞ controller was designed to ensure resilience and robustness for leader-follower systems under faulty and malicious attacks on sensors and/or actuators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%