2024
DOI: 10.1037/sgd0000701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-objectification endorsement among heterosexual and sexual minority people and its association with negative affect and substance use.

Rotem Kahalon,
Tabea Hässler,
Léïla Eisner
Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should also examine the association between selfobjectification and sexual dysfunction among women who are in a relationship with people of other genders-both to avoid heteronormativity (Kahalon et al, 2024;Morgenroth & Ryan, 2018) and to examine whether the negative influence of self-objectification on sexual functioning is more pronounced for women who internalize the 'male gaze' on their body, that is, women who are sexually interested in men (Calogero et al, 2004). Another limitation is that we conducted a cross-sectional study, therefore we cannot draw causal inferences (see Fiedler et al, 2011, for the problem with testing mediation with crosssectional data).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should also examine the association between selfobjectification and sexual dysfunction among women who are in a relationship with people of other genders-both to avoid heteronormativity (Kahalon et al, 2024;Morgenroth & Ryan, 2018) and to examine whether the negative influence of self-objectification on sexual functioning is more pronounced for women who internalize the 'male gaze' on their body, that is, women who are sexually interested in men (Calogero et al, 2004). Another limitation is that we conducted a cross-sectional study, therefore we cannot draw causal inferences (see Fiedler et al, 2011, for the problem with testing mediation with crosssectional data).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%