1998
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot

Abstract: This study compares the measured activation volumes in motor cortex as well as the fluctuation noise and off-resonance characteristics for 1-, 2-, and 4-shot spiral gradient-recalled echo blood oxygen level dependent contrast functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisitions, under conditions of constant resolution and scan time and with two readout durations. Reconstructions were made with and without self-navigator correction. It was found that the navigator correction provided a 50% reduction in ima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
362
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
362
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the RMS field homogeneity after the slice-by-slice shim correction was typically 5.9 Hz and 8.1 Hz over the head area at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively, both of which values are well below that required for significant blurring and affection of the point spread function (19).…”
Section: Spatial Aspects Of Activated Brainmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the RMS field homogeneity after the slice-by-slice shim correction was typically 5.9 Hz and 8.1 Hz over the head area at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively, both of which values are well below that required for significant blurring and affection of the point spread function (19).…”
Section: Spatial Aspects Of Activated Brainmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The SNR was calculated as the ratio of the mean value (signal) from a brain region in the sum image and the standard deviation (noise) in the same ROI in the difference image. A more detailed discussion of this method to calculate SNR has been published recently (19). Note that the SNR calculation was based on an ROI encompassing a mixture between white and gray matter and covering major parts of the brain in the section.…”
Section: Signal-to-noise and Physiological Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SPGR data were aligned such that adjacent pairs of 1.25-mm thick SPGR slices subtended each 2.5-mm thick FSE and DTI slice using custom scanner prescription software, which computed precise slice locations. The data from the spiral acquisition for each echo were gridded and Fourier transformed, and a fieldmap was estimated from a complex difference image between the two echoes (Glover and Lai, 1998;Pfeuffer et al, 2002). The 1.5 T structural data used for this analysis were coronally-acquired FSE images (FOV = 24 cm, T r = 7500 ms TE = 14/98 ms, ETL = 8, thick = 4.0 mm, skip = 0 mm, slices = 47, and echo-train flip angle = 180°).…”
Section: Mri and Dti Acquisition Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BOLD imaging was performed with the use of a gradient-echo sequence (10 6-mm-thick slices, FOV ϭ 16 cm, TE/TR ϭ 40/1500 msec, NEX ϭ 2, ␣ ϭ 90°, bandwidth (BW) ϭ 100 kHz) with a spiral readout (4096 points per spiral) (6). A total of 180 temporal points were collected during which the subjects periodically inhaled 100% O 2 (four cycles of 90 seconds of normoxia, each followed by 45 seconds of 100% O 2 at 22 L/minute).…”
Section: Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%