2014
DOI: 10.1080/15348431.2014.944702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Monitoring Strategies as a Unique Predictor of Latino Male Student Achievement

Abstract: We examined how self-monitoring (i.e., regulating one's behaviors; Snyder, 1987) relates to Latino male achievement. In Study 1, college students (N = 413) completed self-monitoring items and reported SAT math scores. As hypothesized, self-monitoring was positively correlated with achievement for Latino male students but was unrelated to achievement for Latina and White male and female students. Study 2 used a high school sample (N = 174) and observed math performance. Analyses revealed that, again, self-monit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a person learns how to manage both extrinsic and intrinsic conditions, this person can exercise self-control (Mahoney & Thoresen, 1972). Despite the findings which reveal that self-management strategies are in favor of females (Uğurluoğlu, 2010) and males (Covarrubias & Stone, 2015) considering gender, there are findings which reveal that there is not a significant difference between them (Carmeli, Meitar, & Weisberg, 2006;Kazan, 1999;Kurman, 2001;Razieh, Reza, & Saeid, 2013;Türköz, 2010). Therefore, the desire to test the self-management strategies in terms of gender with this adapted scale is another purpose of the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a person learns how to manage both extrinsic and intrinsic conditions, this person can exercise self-control (Mahoney & Thoresen, 1972). Despite the findings which reveal that self-management strategies are in favor of females (Uğurluoğlu, 2010) and males (Covarrubias & Stone, 2015) considering gender, there are findings which reveal that there is not a significant difference between them (Carmeli, Meitar, & Weisberg, 2006;Kazan, 1999;Kurman, 2001;Razieh, Reza, & Saeid, 2013;Türköz, 2010). Therefore, the desire to test the self-management strategies in terms of gender with this adapted scale is another purpose of the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Similarly, Uğurluoğlu (2010) revealed that female health professionals' probability of using "Constructive Thinking Model Strategies" was more than the males. However, considering "Self-Monitoring" (SM), there exits such findings: gender and mathematics achievement was in favor of males (Covarrubias & Stone, 2015), a significant difference did not exist between gender and self-leadership (Carmeli et al, 2006;Kazan, 1999;Kurman, 2001;Razieh et al, 2013;Türköz, 2010) and gender has a meaningful effect on the explanation of variance in self-leadership (Arlı, 2011;Marshall, Kiffin-Petersen, & Soutar, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the ndings that gender management strategies are in favor of women and men, there are also ndings that there is no signi cant difference between them. (Uğurluoğlu, 2010;Covarrubias & Stone, 2015;Kurman, 2001;Kazan, 1999;Razieh et al, 2013;Carmelivet al, 2006). According to the gender variable in a study by Ercoşkun; it is stated that there is a signi cant difference in favor of female teacher candidates in self-adjustment, self-assessment, selfreinforcement sub-dimensions and total score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, research shows that college students with high self-monitoring skills are more resistant to backlash effects than low self-monitors to adjust their behavior during different social settings, including those that are socially stressful (Covarrubias & Stone, 2015).…”
Section: Self-monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%