Self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes living in France: The Entred study 2001

Lecomte, P.; Romon, I.; Fosse, S.; Simon, D.; Fagot-Campagna, A.

doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2007.11.005

Cited by 40 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The answer of how often and under which circumstances patients perform SMBG in real-life conditions in France comes from a national survey of people being treated for diabetes. It was found that 38% of the 2,689 people participating in the survey with NIT-DM perform SMBG testing regularly (six times a week on average), whereas in only 3% of subjects, the regular use of SMBG is not related to any special needs or events (such as insulin treatment, occurrence of severe hypoglycemia, or chronic complications) (32). …”

Section: Frequency and Timing Of Smbg Among Nit-dm Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as Part of the Integral Care of Type 2 Diabetes

Boutati

Raptis

2009

Diabetes Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results from landmark diabetes studies have established A1C as the gold standard for assessing long-term glycemic control. However, A1C does not provide “real-time” information about individual hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic excursions. Real-time information provided by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) represents an important adjunct to A1C, because it can differentiate fasting, preprandial, and postprandial hyperglycemia; detect glycemic excursions; identify hypoglycemia; and provide immediate feedback about the effect of food choices, physical activity, and medication on glycemic control. The importance of SMBG is widely appreciated and recommended as a core component of management in patients with type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, as well as in diabetic pregnancy, for both women with pregestational type 1 and gestational diabetes. Nevertheless, SMBG in management of non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients continues to be debated. Results from clinical trials are inconclusive, and reviews fail to reach an agreement, mainly because of methodological problems. Carefully designed large-scale studies on diverse patient populations with type 2 diabetes with the follow-up period to investigate long-term effects of SMBG in patients with type 2 diabetes should be carried out to clarify how to make the best use of SMBG, in which patients, and under what conditions.

show abstract

Section: Frequency and Timing Of Smbg Among Nit-dm Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as Part of the Integral Care of Type 2 Diabetes

Boutati

Raptis

2009

Diabetes Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies have shown a significant gap between recommended SMBG utilization and the real-world practice. [567]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[712] However, these observational studies were not conceptually integrated and did not reveal the ultimate elements generating SMBG behavior, thus hardly suggested any actionable intervention target. A more integrated and systemic method is required to better understand SMBG behavior and to provide directions for practical interventions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavioral Analysis of Chinese Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose

Qin¹,

Yan²,

Yang³

et al. 2017

Chinese Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model of health behavior is an effective tool to evaluate the behavior of diabetes self-management. The purpose of this study was to explore behavioral factors affecting the practice of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) within the frame of IMB model of health behavioral among adult patients with type 1 diabetes in a single diabetes clinic in China.Methods:A questionnaire with three subscales on SMBG information, motivation, and behavioral skills based on IMB model was developed. Validity and reliability of the measures were examined and guaranteed. Adult patients with type 1 diabetes visiting our diabetes clinic from January to March 2012 (n = 55) were consecutively interviewed. The self-completion questionnaires were administered and finished at face-to-face interviews among these patients. Both descriptive and correlational analyses were made.Results:Fifty-five patients finished the questionnaires, with the median duration of diabetes 4.5 years and the median of SMBG frequency 2.00. Specific SMBG information deficits, motivation obstacles, and behavioral skill limitations were identified in a substantial proportion of participants. Scores of SMBG motivation (r = 0.299, P = 0.026) and behavioral skills (r = 0.425, P = 0.001) were significantly correlated with SMBG frequency. The multiple correlation of SMBG information, SMBG motivation, and SMBG behavioral skills with SMBG frequency was R = 0.411 (R2 = 0.169, P = 0.023).Conclusions:Adult patients with type 1 diabetes in our clinic had substantial SMBG information deficits, motivation obstacles, and skill limitations. This information provided potential-focused education targets for diabetes health-care providers.

show abstract

“…So müssen hier nicht nur die Kosten für die Anschaffung und die Verbrauchsmaterialien der Insulinpumpentherapie direkt berechnet werden[20], sondern es muss auch berücksichtigt werden, dass Patienten mit CSII im Mittel mehr Blutglukoseselbstkontrollen durchführen, als Patienten mit ICT. Die mittlere Häufigkeit der Blutglukoseselbstkontrollen der Patienten in der vorliegenden Untersuchung lag vergleichbar den Werten, die aus anderen Rehabilitationseinrichtungen bekannt sind[25,27], aber deutlich über der Zahl von Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes aus Populationsoder anderen Untersuchungen[17,24,26]. Auch dieser Unterschied unterstreicht, dass es sich bei den Patienten der Rehabilitation um eine Kohorte mit spezifischen Problemen der Stoffwechselführung handelt.…”

unclassified

Unterschiede zwischen intensivierter Insulintherapie mittels Insulininjektionen (ICT) und Insulinpumpentherapie (CSII) bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Typ-1-Diabetes mellitus

Schiel

Burgard²,

Bambauer

et al. 2013

Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Einleitung: Die Indikationen f?r eine station?re Rehabilitation bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Typ-1-Diabetes sind nach Aussch?pfung ambulanter Behandlungsmethoden die Notwendigkeit der Intensivierung einer Therapie, eine Verbesserung des Krankheitsmanagements, des Stoffwechsels und/oder der psychosozialen Teilhabe. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war es bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Typ-1-Diabetes mellitus, die zur station?ren Rehabilitation eingewiesen worden waren, Unterschiede zu analysieren zwischen Patienten mit Insulinpumpen- und solchen mit konventioneller Injektionstherapie. Patienten und Methoden: Es wurden alle Kinder und Jugendlichen (n?=?901, 52?% M?dchen, Alter 11,5???4,0 Jahre, Diabetesdauer 4,0???3,6 Jahre, HbA1c 8,61???2,12?%) mit Typ-1-Diabetes in die Untersuchung aufgenommen, die zwischen dem 1.4.2004 und dem 31.10.2010 an einer station?ren Rehabilitationsma?nahme teilgenommen hatten. Ergebnisse: Bei Aufnahme hatten 707 Patienten eine ICT, 194 eine CSII. 10?% der Kinder (n?=?92) waren im Vorschulalter (

show abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes living in France: The Entred study 2001

Cited by 40 publications

References 23 publications

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as Part of the Integral Care of Type 2 Diabetes

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as Part of the Integral Care of Type 2 Diabetes

Behavioral Analysis of Chinese Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose

Unterschiede zwischen intensivierter Insulintherapie mittels Insulininjektionen (ICT) und Insulinpumpentherapie (CSII) bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Typ-1-Diabetes mellitus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About