1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90855-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Monitoring of Blood-Glucose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
1
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
48
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has long been considered the treatment of choice (Watkins 1982) and patients receiving twice-daily insulin have previously been shown to have lower mean blood glucose levels than those on a single daily insulin injection (Paisey et al 1982). Home glucose monitoring with meter-read test strips has been shown to lead to an improvement in control in the majority of patients (Sonksen et al 1978, Walford et al 1978, but in this study we found no significant difference in HbA1 between urine testers and those who performed home blood glucose monitoring. Intensive education has been shown to improve control without any further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring (Worth et al 1982) and a recent survey in one of our clinics (in preparation) has revealed that many of our patients perform insufficient tests and do not make independent adjustments to their insulin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…This has long been considered the treatment of choice (Watkins 1982) and patients receiving twice-daily insulin have previously been shown to have lower mean blood glucose levels than those on a single daily insulin injection (Paisey et al 1982). Home glucose monitoring with meter-read test strips has been shown to lead to an improvement in control in the majority of patients (Sonksen et al 1978, Walford et al 1978, but in this study we found no significant difference in HbA1 between urine testers and those who performed home blood glucose monitoring. Intensive education has been shown to improve control without any further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring (Worth et al 1982) and a recent survey in one of our clinics (in preparation) has revealed that many of our patients perform insufficient tests and do not make independent adjustments to their insulin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…With larger numbers ( n = 64), Sönksen et al showed that 64% of patients were able to maintain 80% of blood glucose values < 10.0 mmol/l over a period of > 1 year [3]. In a similar sized study cohort ( n = 69), half of the patients had capillary blood glucose profiles in which no more than one value exceeded 10.0 mmol/l [4]. Other, albeit smaller, studies confirmed these results [5][6][7].…”
Section: Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: a Complete Guide To Achievingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values obtained in hospital are often not representative of metabolic control under normal living conditions, hence the growing use of home monitoring with glucose sensitive enzymetipped strips, with or without reflectance meters [2][3][4]. Such methods have great value but may be subject to a degree of error and bias which is sometimes unacceptable and it may then be desirable for samples to be collected at home by the patients, but estimated in the laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%