2014
DOI: 10.1109/lmag.2014.2315973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Modulated Soliton Modes Excited in a Nanocontact Spin-Torque Oscillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the measured high-frequency dynamics, associated with the spin precession, has a blueshift with the applied current, different to predictions 10 and micromagnetic results 25 . We cannot explain it with our model and we attribute such effect to the appearance of an effective field perpendicular to the film plane due to the applied current (likely an Oersted-field effect from the leads).…”
contrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that the measured high-frequency dynamics, associated with the spin precession, has a blueshift with the applied current, different to predictions 10 and micromagnetic results 25 . We cannot explain it with our model and we attribute such effect to the appearance of an effective field perpendicular to the film plane due to the applied current (likely an Oersted-field effect from the leads).…”
contrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Some experiments have shown the presence of side bands in the precession frequency of the soliton 15 suggesting that the soliton might be undergoing drift instabilities. Micromagnetic studies have also predicted the side bands and attributed them to drift instabilities 15,25 . Our direct observation of the low frequency dynamics proves the existence of drift instabilities and explains why dc measurements fail to measure full magnetization reversal-showing on average just a fraction of the magnetization reversed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal frequency after the jump is close to the Zeeman frequency, the prediction for a reversed droplet soliton, f Zeeman = γμ 0 H/(2π), where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio 1,2 . We note here that a single spectral line is observed, with no self-modulation 15 , as predicted for a sufficiently large free magnetic layer saturation magnetization or exchange constant 18 . Figure 1c shows that at 0.8 T (m z,P ≈ 0.73) we only observe the lower-frequency (magnetic droplet) excitation and the frequency increases (blueshifts) with increasing current (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…1(c), where the core is partially reversed and the spins both in the core and in the droplet perimeter precess inphase. Although droplet theory [40] was developed for fully perpendicular spin valves, reported experiments [41,44] have used STNOs where the remanent state of the fixed layer is in the film plane, which can promote droplet instability and auto-modulation [41,[47][48][49]. In this orthogonal geometry, the current-field phase diagram of the droplet qualitatively differs from the theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Magnetic Droplet Nucleation Current Vs Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%