1991
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.2.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-injection and needle sharing among migrant farmworkers.

Abstract: Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will bepublished, iffound suitable, as space permits. Submission ofa Letter to the Editor constitutes pemission for its publication in the Joumal. Letters should not duplicate similar material being submitted orpublished elsewhere. Letters refemng to a recent Journal article should be received within three months ofthe article'spublication. The editors reserve the fight to edit and abridge letters, topublish replies, and to solicit responses from authors and others. Lette… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of participants left their primary partners behind but still reported having sex with women in the US and exchanging food, shelter, drugs or money for sex. Although the survey instrument was unable to differentiate between men paying money for sex with a commercial sex worker and men who participated in commercial sex work themselves, the former is presumed based on previous research (Bronfman, 1998;Lafferty, 1991;Magis-Rodriguez et al, 2004;Mishra, Conner, & Magañ a, 1996;Organista et al, 2004;Organista & Kubo, 2005;Ruiz et al, 1997;Sanchez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of participants left their primary partners behind but still reported having sex with women in the US and exchanging food, shelter, drugs or money for sex. Although the survey instrument was unable to differentiate between men paying money for sex with a commercial sex worker and men who participated in commercial sex work themselves, the former is presumed based on previous research (Bronfman, 1998;Lafferty, 1991;Magis-Rodriguez et al, 2004;Mishra, Conner, & Magañ a, 1996;Organista et al, 2004;Organista & Kubo, 2005;Ruiz et al, 1997;Sanchez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,48,82,85,88,94,101 Dose of antimicrobials was also commonly lower than standard doses. 10,41,85,89 Parenteral antimicrobials were often available without prescription. 52,66,68,[89][90][91][92] An additional safety concern was substandard quality of antimicrobials available without prescription.…”
Section: Frequency Of Non-prescription Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,41,85,89 Parenteral antimicrobials were often available without prescription. 52,66,68,[89][90][91][92] An additional safety concern was substandard quality of antimicrobials available without prescription. Expired drugs or those that, as a result of degradation, have decreased bioavailability might both predispose a patient to treatment failure and promote antimicrobial resistance.…”
Section: Frequency Of Non-prescription Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,19,20 These practices are supported by cultural health beliefs on the effectiveness of injected drugs, lack of access to standard health care, and difficulties obtaining clean needles in the US. Our data support the idea that needle-sharing rates are unacceptably high among MMIs in all stages of the migration process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these practices may be less prevalent among this population than indicated by research with convenience samples of Mexican farm workers in the US. 7,19,20 More research is necessary regarding the specific purposes and determinants of needle sharing in each migration context and the means by which the prevalence of these practices can be reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%