Self, follower, organization and the context – a cross cultural view of authentic leadership

Abstract

Purpose – Scholars have argued that it is important to investigate how authentic leadership is manifested in different cultures (Avolio et al., 2005; Gardiner, 2011; Shamir and Eilam, 2005). Hence the purpose of this paper is to capture a cross-cultural view of authentic leadership, using a sample of South Asian leaders. Design/methodology/approach – Because of a dearth of qualitative empirical evidence, the authors adopted a “life story” approach to collect data. A total of 14 leaders from India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka were interviewed to share their leadership experiences. Findings – Findings indicate that the concept of authentic leadership is culturally relevant. It emerged as a multi-dimensional construct constituting self-concept, follower development, organizational outcomes and culture (Meacham, 2007), and contextual knowledge. The authors propose a cross-cultural model of authentic leadership. Research limitations/implications – Research limitations include researchers’ possible biases in design of data and an assumption that leaders interviewed were authentic. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights about authentic leadership to strengthen its theoretical foundation. Social implications – Organizational and social problems in South Asian are often attributed to a leadership deficit (Khan, 2014; Khilji, 2013; National Post, 2014; Sardesai, 2013). This study provides evidence of transformative authentic leaders in South Asia who are engaged with their and followers’ authentic growth, and are building authentic cultures for positive organizational outcomes. Originality/value – The value of the present research is in providing qualitative empirical evidence from South Asia, and proposing a cross-cultural model of authentic leadership.

Authentic leadership: unleashing employee creativity through empowerment and commitment to the supervisor

“…However, authentic leadership with empowerment has seldom been addressed in a non-western context, and it may not here be appropriate to apply existing findings due to regional, cultural and economic differences (Witt and Redding, 2013;Ahmad and Oranye, 2010). This is a gap that needs to be filled by contemporary researchers (Khilji et al, 2015).…”

Authentic Leadership and Openness to Change in Pakistani Service Industry: The Mediating Role of Trust and Transparent Communication

“…This article proposes that authentic leadership can affect followers' important, popular attitudes and beliefs about change namely cynicism about change (Bommer, Rich, & Rubin, 2005;Dean, Brandes, & Dharwadkar, 1998;Reichers, Wanous, & Austin, 1997;Stanley, Meyer, & Topolnytsky, 2005) commitment to change (Herscovitch & Meyer, 2002) .Though authentic leadership has been developed in Western context (Gardner, Avolio, Luthans, & May, 2005). Its relevance to Pakistani culture has been proved in a recent study in which the authors applying a life story approach reviewed interviews of 14 leaders from South Asia including Pakistan (Khilji, Keilson, Shakir, & Shrestha, 2015). The authors further posit that keeping in view the problems faced by Pakistani organizations attributed to lack of leadership, the concept of authentic leadership may provide avenues to foster positive organizational behaviors in followers (p. 18).…”

Putting the leader back into authentic leadership: Reconceptualising and rethinking leaders

“…stereotyping, tokenisation and exoticisation) as a result of seeking to enable the presentation of an authentic self. Previous research has found that leaders who are indigenous (Faircloth, 2017), female (Eagly, 2005; Fox-Kirk, 2017; Gardiner, 2015; Hopkins and O’Neil, 2015), racial minorities (Jones, 2016), have cultural differences (Khilji et al, 2015) or have a disability (Procknow et al, 2017) experience some tension in practicing authentic leadership.…”