2010
DOI: 10.1364/ol.35.001653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-focusing in air with phase-stabilized few-cycle light pulses

Abstract: We investigate the nonlinear optical phenomenon of self-focusing in air with phase-stabilized few-cycle light pulses. This investigation looks at the role of the carrier-envelope phase by observing a filament in air, a nonlinear phenomenon that can be utilized for few-cycle pulse compression [Appl. Phys. B79, 673 (2004)]. We were able to measure the critical power for self-focusing in air to be 18+/-1 GW for a 6.3 fs pulse centered at 800 nm. Using this value and a basic first-order theory, we predicted that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value of critical power experimentally retrieved from our experiments is significantly smaller than other critical power measured in air (10 GW for τ¼42 fs, 5 GW for τ4200 fs [33] and 18 GW for τ¼6.3 fs [13]), and it is likely that our measurement performed in a rather strong converging geometry compared to others experiments may be significantly skewed by other competing nonlinear effects like air ionization [14]. A rather high critical power was expected when using ultrashort pulse (like in our experiment) because only the instantaneous electron contribution to Kerr effect could contribute in this temporal regime and not the delayed Kerr effect related to the response of the nucleus [38].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Beam Spatial Propertiescontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value of critical power experimentally retrieved from our experiments is significantly smaller than other critical power measured in air (10 GW for τ¼42 fs, 5 GW for τ4200 fs [33] and 18 GW for τ¼6.3 fs [13]), and it is likely that our measurement performed in a rather strong converging geometry compared to others experiments may be significantly skewed by other competing nonlinear effects like air ionization [14]. A rather high critical power was expected when using ultrashort pulse (like in our experiment) because only the instantaneous electron contribution to Kerr effect could contribute in this temporal regime and not the delayed Kerr effect related to the response of the nucleus [38].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Beam Spatial Propertiescontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Indeed, if we assume the interaction of a 10 fs laser pulse of 10 mJ energy at the surface of a dielectrics, one should expect a laser-induced threshold for ablation in the range of 1 J/cm² [11,12]). However, it corresponds to an incident beam power close to the critical power in air ( $ 10 GW [13,14]) and an intensity in the Rayleigh range close to air ionization and intensity clamping ( $ 5 Â 10 13 -10 14 W/cm² for pulse range of 100 fs duration [15][16][17][18][19]). In those conditions, maintaining the optical properties of the incident laser beam till the sample located in the focal plane of a focusing element may be highly questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the pulse-width dependence of the Kerr effect had been probed only indirectly by measurements of critical power in self-focusing [12,29]. However, it was recently shown that critical power measurements can be complicated by defocusing effects from plasma generation [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interpretations have not been verified experimentally [13]. In 2010, Laban et al predicted that the length of the filament generated by 6.3-fs laser pulses in air should * hteng@iphy.ac.cn † zywei@iphy.ac.cn change by 790-μm the CEP shifted π/2 rad; to the best of our knowledge, there is no clear experimental evidence to support this prediction [14]. In fact, the CEP effect during the interaction between the laser and air filament has not been fully investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%