2020
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐facilitation and negative species interactions could drive microscale vegetation mosaic in a floating fen

Abstract: Aim The formation of a local vegetation mosaic may be attributed to local variation in abiotic environmental conditions. Recent research, however, indicates that self‐facilitating organisms and negative species interactions may be a driving factor. In this study, we explore whether heterogeneous geohydrological conditions or vegetation feedbacks and interactions could be responsible for a vegetation mosaic of rich and poor fen species. Location Lake Aturtaun, Roundstone Bog, Ireland. Methods In a floating fen,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the beginning and at the end of the experiment ( t = 0 and 96 h), the dissolved organic and inorganic carbon concentrations (DOC and DIC, respectively) were measured, as well as total suspended solids. Water samples for DIC analyses were filtered with glass-fiber filters (Ø 0.45 µm), stored at 4 °C, and measured within 24 h after sampling using infrared gas analyses (IRGA, ABB Advance Optima, Frankfurt, Germany; as in van Bergen et al 2020 ). Samples for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were filtered (Ø 0.45 µm) and analyzed using a Shimadzu TOC-L CPH/CPN Analyser (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the beginning and at the end of the experiment ( t = 0 and 96 h), the dissolved organic and inorganic carbon concentrations (DOC and DIC, respectively) were measured, as well as total suspended solids. Water samples for DIC analyses were filtered with glass-fiber filters (Ø 0.45 µm), stored at 4 °C, and measured within 24 h after sampling using infrared gas analyses (IRGA, ABB Advance Optima, Frankfurt, Germany; as in van Bergen et al 2020 ). Samples for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were filtered (Ø 0.45 µm) and analyzed using a Shimadzu TOC-L CPH/CPN Analyser (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total Inorganic Carbon (TIC) was measured using an infrared carbon analyzer (IRGA; ABB Analytical, Frankfurt, Germany), after which bicarbonate (HCO3) and CO 2 were calculated based on the pH equilibrium (e.g., van Bergen et al. 2020). A 10‐mL subsample of each filtered water sample (Glass microfiber filters, outer diameter 47 mm, GF/C, Whatman, GE Healthcare UK Limited, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) was conserved by adding 0.1 mL of nitric acid (HNO3 65%) and stored at 4°C until P analysis by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrophotometry (ICP‐OES; model IRIS Intrepid II XDL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, Tennessee, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within one day after sampling, pH and alkalinity of the porewater were determined using an Ag/AgCl electrode (Orion Research, Beverly, MA, USA) and a TIM 840 Titration Manager (Radiometer Analytical SAS, Villeurbanne, France). Total inorganic carbon (TIC -HCO 3 and CO 2 ) was measured using an infrared carbon analyser (IRGA; ABB Analytical, Frankfurt, Germany), followed by pH-based calculation of CO 2 and HCO 3 -concentrations (van Bergen et al, 2020). Finally, at each sampling station, we determined the fetch as the maximum distance from the sampling station toward the land in north, north-east, east, southeast, south, south-west, west and north-west direction with Google Earth Pro.…”
Section: Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%