2016
DOI: 10.1111/den.12585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐expanding metallic stent improves histopathological edema compared with transanal drainage tube for malignant colorectal obstruction

Abstract: Significantly greater resolution of histopathologic edema was achieved after placement of SEMS than after placement of TDT. These findings provide an indication of favorable clinical outcomes of SEMS in comparison with TDT and ESFD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We had not performed SEMS in the present study period because Kim et al showed that SEMS was associated with peritoneal seeding after perforation [8]. However, it was shown that the technical success rates were 100% for SEMS and 78.9% for TDT and significantly greater resolution of histopathological edema was achieved after the placement of SEMSs than after the placement of TDTs [9]. No significant difference in postoperative mortality was reported between SEMS and TDT [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We had not performed SEMS in the present study period because Kim et al showed that SEMS was associated with peritoneal seeding after perforation [8]. However, it was shown that the technical success rates were 100% for SEMS and 78.9% for TDT and significantly greater resolution of histopathological edema was achieved after the placement of SEMSs than after the placement of TDTs [9]. No significant difference in postoperative mortality was reported between SEMS and TDT [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, a recent report stated that endoscopically placing a decompression device is helpful for subsequent elective laparoscopic colectomy and one‐stage anastomosis . Many studies have reported that SEMS placement is effective for decompression and can be a bridge to elective surgery, with reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality and a significantly increased success rate for one‐stage anastomosis . For LMCO, a longer duration of decompression leads to reduced edema and increased safety for one‐stage anastomosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐expanding metallic stent (SEMS) placement is recognized as safe and effective for malignant colonic obstruction (MCO), especially for left‐sided MCO (LMCO) . However, the efficacy of SEMS for right‐sided MCO (RMCO) is not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histopathologically, the tumor was diagnosed as T4a, N0 (0/12), M0, stage IIB, according to UICC classification [3]. In addition, histopathological examination showed that the tumor was resected with negative resection margins (R0-resection) and revealed the absence of intestinal edema, on the basis of edema criteria, on the oral side [1] (Fig. 5a, b).…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO), preoperative decompression by placing a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) has been recognized as a safe and effective therapeutic strategy, and there is ample evidence for the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery after SEMS placement [1, 2]. However, no studies have reported robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) after SEMS placement for malignant rectal obstruction (MRO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%