2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-expanding metal ureteral stent for ureteral stricture: Experience of a large-scale prospective study from a high-volume center - Cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large-scale prospective study with 147 patients receiving 157 Allium stents, reported effective urinary drainage in nearly all patients. The most common complications were hematuria (13 cases, 8.8%), followed by urinary tract infection (11 cases, 7.5%) and pain (8 cases, 5.4%), and distal ureteral stenosis was found to be an independent predictor of stent failure [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A large-scale prospective study with 147 patients receiving 157 Allium stents, reported effective urinary drainage in nearly all patients. The most common complications were hematuria (13 cases, 8.8%), followed by urinary tract infection (11 cases, 7.5%) and pain (8 cases, 5.4%), and distal ureteral stenosis was found to be an independent predictor of stent failure [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our study, the stent migration rate was 11.1% (3/27), which falls within the range of previously reported migration rates (between 10.3% and 23.6%) when followed up for a similar duration. [16,21,23] It is interesting to note that the displaced stents in this study were all located at the distal end of the ureter, which may be due to the severe compression of the distal ureteral stenosis. This can cause uneven force on the stent, leading to its migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regardless of the cause of ureteral stricture, timely relief of obstruction can help to protect kidney function. [21] Although conventional double-J stents are effective, they have limitations. Chen et al [22] conducted a study comparing the safety and efficacy of conventional and metal stents, and found that metal stents demonstrated a higher patency rate at 6 months (100% vs 83.8%) and 1 year (91.7% vs 40.0%) than conventional stents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall surgical success rate was 73.2% over a follow-up of 15 months. [20] Furthermore, covered metallic ureteral stent was originally used in treating malignant ureteral strictures, however, it also works well in benign and iatrogenic ureteral strictures, which may be caused by retroperitoneal fibrosis, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and ureteroileal anastomotic stenosis. [5][6][7]21,22] Nevertheless, whether or not it can be used for the long-term maintenance treatment of recurrent UPJO has not been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%