2005
DOI: 10.1177/002242940505300205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Evaluation Accuracy among High School and Middle School Instrumentalists

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to examine (a) whether grade-level differences exist on self-evaluation tendencies over time, (b) if grade-level differences and evaluator differences exist, alone and in combination, on music performance evaluation, (c) if relationships exist between student self-evaluation and expert evaluations of music performance by grade level, and (d) whether differences exist between grade level and music performance subarea (tone, intonation, melody, etc.) on self-evaluation accuracy. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the students' responses showed that they had high level of self-control in most of the items, their mean level of readiness was above 4 in only one of the 15 items. Their level of self-control was, therefore, not considered good enough especially because students have been shown in literature to rate themselves higher than their teachers in most cases (Hewitt, 2005;Sitzmann, Ely, Brown, & Bauer, 2010). A greater level of readiness is desirous because the students' self-rating in this study could probably be on the high side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although the students' responses showed that they had high level of self-control in most of the items, their mean level of readiness was above 4 in only one of the 15 items. Their level of self-control was, therefore, not considered good enough especially because students have been shown in literature to rate themselves higher than their teachers in most cases (Hewitt, 2005;Sitzmann, Ely, Brown, & Bauer, 2010). A greater level of readiness is desirous because the students' self-rating in this study could probably be on the high side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies of concurrent conducting and error detection indicate experience is the single factor that may best predict error detection scores (Byo & Sheldon, 2000;DeCarbo, 1982;Rentz, 1992). Related skills in listening during instrumental performance, such as self-evaluation (Hewitt, 2005) and intonation (Morrison, 2000;Yarbrough, Morrison, & Karrick, 1997), also seem to increase with experience, although playing by ear has been found to not be affected by playing experience (Delzell, Rohwer, & Ballard, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocally, increased self-efficacy has been found to lead to higher self-evaluations, which themselves become increasingly underconfident as performance ability increases (Hewitt, 2015). In general, self-assessments are found to be higher than those of third-party experts (Hewitt, 2002, 2005). Such optimism in self-assessment has been linked to higher performance achievement and persistence in comparison with students displaying more realistic or pessimistic tendencies (Bonneville-Roussy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%