Self-Estimated Functional Inability Because of Pain Questionnaire for Athletes: A Reliability and Construct Validity Study

Reis-Júnior, Jodimar Ribeiro dos; Pinheiro, Jocassia Silva; Protázio, Jhonata Botelho; Pinheiro, Cezar Augusto Brito; Gomes, Cid André Fidelis de Paula; Pires, Flávio de Oliveira; Souza, Sérgio; Anselmo-e-Silva, Cassius Iury; Souza, Cesário da Silva; Bassi‐Dibai, Daniela; Dibai‐Filho, Almir Vieira

doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2021.02.002

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to our study, the Turkish version of the SEFIP-dance had adequate test-retest reliability (ICC=0.807) and a correlation magnitude of 0.672 with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 12 . The Brazilian version of the SEFIP-sport also found adequate measurement properties, with ICC value of 0.91, Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 and a correlation magnitude of 0.481 with the NPRS 6 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Self-Estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for workers: a reliability and construct validity study

Melo

Dibai‐Filho

Oliveira

et al. 2021

Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability and construct validity of the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers in a sample of Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain.METHODS: This is a questionnaire validation study. Workers with musculoskeletal pain were included. Besides the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers, we used the following instruments to perform construct validity: the Work Ability Index and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. A subsample answered the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers in two moments to calculate reliability by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient and internal consistency by means of the Cronbach's alpha.RESULTS: A total of 190 Brazilian workers were included. Regarding the construct validity, we observed a correlation with magnitude above 0.50 between the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, given that these two instruments have similarity in the construct, and correlations above 0.30 between the Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers and the domains 2, 3, and 4 of the Work Ability Index. Regarding reliability, we observed adequate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.864) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.807).CONCLUSION: The Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain questionnaire for workers is a reliable and valid instrument to be used in Brazilian workers with musculoskeletal pain.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…The SEFIP was initially developed and validated to investigate the musculoskeletal injuries in dancers (SEFIP-dance) 4,5 . However, due to its broad structure, this questionnaire has been adapted for athletes (SEFIP-sport) 5,6 and for workers (SEFIP-work) 3 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for workers: a reliability and construct validity study

Melo

Dibai‐Filho

Oliveira

et al. 2021

Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SEFIP-sport was validated for Brazilian Portuguese by Reis-Júnior et al [ 22 ] and Reis-Júnior et al [ 23 ] to measure musculoskeletal pain and disability related to sports practice in a regionalized way (considering the parts of the body separately). The SEFIP-sport is composed of 14 items, with responses on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 represents “no pain” and 4 represents “I can’t play the sport because of the pain”.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fear of Return to Sport Scale (FRESS): a new instrument for use in injured professional or recreational athletes in rehabilitation

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To create, develop, and validate the Fear of Return to Sport Scale (FRESS) for injured professional or recreational athletes in rehabilitation. Methods This is a questionnaire validation study. To determine the structural and construct validity, 192 injured professional or recreational athletes of different sports modalities were included. We used a subsample with 32 participants to analyze test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Main outcome measures were the FRESS, Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale (PCTS), Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain Questionnaire for athletes (SEFIP-sport), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results Initially, 25 questions were proposed by the specialists. Of these, 4 questions were excluded due to similarity with others. After applying the content validity coefficient, 8 questions were excluded for presenting a value lower than 0.80, leaving 13 items. The exploratory factor analysis identified the one-dimensional structure of the FRESS with 13 items. However, five items were excluded for presenting high covariance with the error of several other FRESS items in the confirmatory factor analysis. Thus, the final version of the FRESS was defined with one domain and eight items. Regarding the construct validity, we observed a magnitude of correlation varying between 0.257 and 0.470 between the FRESS and the instruments used here. We observed adequate test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.896) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.868). Ceiling and floor effects were not observed. Conclusion The FRESS with one domain and eight items has acceptable measurement properties and its use in clinical and sports environments to measure the fear of returning to sport in injured professional or recreational athletes is supported. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11332-022-00975-4.

show abstract

“…The SEFIP-sport was validated for Brazil by Reis-Junior et al [16] and Reis-Junior et al [17] and it measures disability related to sports practice through 14 items.…”

Section: Assessment Of Measurement Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) into Brazilian Portuguese

Reis-Júnior

Bassi‐Dibai

Morais

et al. 2022

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Psychological factors play an important role in the adequate return of an athlete to sport. Our aim was to perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) into Brazilian Portuguese. Methods We performed the translation and cross-cultural adaptation and evaluated the structural validity, construct validity, and test–retest reliability. In addition to the AFAQ, we used the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale (PCTS), Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain Questionnaire for athletes (SEFIP-sport), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We used the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to analyze the internal structure of the AFAQ. We used the Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) to determine the magnitude of correlation between the AFAQ and the other instruments. We evaluated the test–retest reliability and internal consistency by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Results No adaptation was necessary to produce the AFAQ version in Brazilian Portuguese. We included 160 participants in the study. We identified the one-dimensionality of the AFAQ through the EFA with the implementation of parallel analysis (KMO = 0.83, p < 0.001 in Bartlett's Sphericity test). In construct validity, the magnitudes of correlation between the AFAQ and the other instruments ranged from 0.257 to 0.548. We identified adequate reliability (ICC = 0.85) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90). Conclusion The Brazilian version of the AFAQ with one domain and 10 items has adequate measurement properties in injured professional and recreational athletes.

show abstract

Self-Estimated Functional Inability Because of Pain Questionnaire for Athletes: A Reliability and Construct Validity Study

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

Self-Estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for workers: a reliability and construct validity study

Self-Estimated functional inability because of pain questionnaire for workers: a reliability and construct validity study

Fear of Return to Sport Scale (FRESS): a new instrument for use in injured professional or recreational athletes in rehabilitation

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Athlete Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (AFAQ) into Brazilian Portuguese

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About