2022
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac4489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-error-rejecting multipartite entanglement purification for electron systems assisted by quantum-dot spins in optical microcavities

Abstract: We present a self-error-rejecting multipartite entanglement purification protocol (MEPP) for N-electron-spin entangled states, resorting to the single-side cavity-spin-coupling system. Our MEPP has a high efficiency containing two steps. One is to obtain high-fidelity N-electron-spin entangled systems with error-heralded parity-check devices (PCDs) in the same parity-mode outcome of three electron-spin pairs, as well as M-electron-spin entangled subsystems (2 ≤ M < N) in the different parity-mode outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42] It is considered one of the most promising candidates for realizing nonlinear interactions in solid-state quantum systems. [43,44] QD-cavity coupled system enables various quantum information processing tasks, including entanglement generation, [45,46] entanglement analysis, [47,48] entanglement swapping, [49,50] entanglement purification, [51,52] entanglement concentration, [35,53] quantum repeaters, [54,55] and quantum gates. [35,[56][57][58][59][60] An electron-system PCG was constructed in two optical microcavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] It is considered one of the most promising candidates for realizing nonlinear interactions in solid-state quantum systems. [43,44] QD-cavity coupled system enables various quantum information processing tasks, including entanglement generation, [45,46] entanglement analysis, [47,48] entanglement swapping, [49,50] entanglement purification, [51,52] entanglement concentration, [35,53] quantum repeaters, [54,55] and quantum gates. [35,[56][57][58][59][60] An electron-system PCG was constructed in two optical microcavities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One trenchant method to prevent the degradation of entanglement is entanglement concentration protocol (ECP), which is used to distill maximally entangled states from partially entangled pure states, in particular the imperfect entangled source or decoherence of entanglement from the storage process. Another efficacious one is entanglement purification protocol (EPP), which is used to increase the fidelity of required maximally entangled state in mixed entangled state, including EPPs based on controlled-not gate (or parity check gate, PCG) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], deterministic EPPs [36][37][38], measurementbased EPPs [39][40][41][42][43], and hyperentanglement-assisted EPPs [44][45][46], which is applied to get maximally entangled states with higher fidelity from the mixed entangled states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when it turns into realistic condition, the practical scattering becomes imperfect, which would lead to computation errors appearing in the result of the quantum gate in company with the reduced fidelity [73] and may accordingly reduce the quality of the entanglement distillation accomplished with quantum gates. [74,75] That is to say, the performance of the quantum gates is restricted by the realistic condition such as coupling strength, cavity leakage and frequency difference. For improving the performance of quantum gates in the realistic condition and relaxing the requirement for experiment, it is worthy to seek ways for implementing quantum gates working with fewer computation errors and higher fidelity in the realistic condition via different methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%