1999
DOI: 10.1080/089856299283209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-employment intentions among Russian students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
376
6
27

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 468 publications
(467 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
32
376
6
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence reported by Kreuger et al (2000), drawn from a sample of university business students, supports the entrepreneurial event model. The conclusion that there is little evidence for self-efficacy is also supported by the subsequent research (Gatewood et al 1995, Tkachev and Kolvereid 1999, Krueger et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence reported by Kreuger et al (2000), drawn from a sample of university business students, supports the entrepreneurial event model. The conclusion that there is little evidence for self-efficacy is also supported by the subsequent research (Gatewood et al 1995, Tkachev and Kolvereid 1999, Krueger et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1 Blanchflower et al (2001) report high rates of response to the question in the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 'would you prefer to be self-employed' (rather than an employee): Norway ¼ 27%; Sweden ¼ 39%; Great Britain ¼ 45%; USA ¼ 71%. Tkachev and Kolvereid (1999) report that 37% of Russian students sampled state a preference for self-employment. Such questions may identify broad aspiration towards entrepreneurship on an open time-scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models aim to explain entrepreneurial intentions such as the Shapero's Entrepreneurial Event Model (Shapero & Sokol, 1982), the Model of Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas (Bird, 1988) or Maximization of the Expected Utility (Douglas & Shepherd, 2002). Although these models represent a step forward in entrepreneurial behavior research, they have not been as influential as the TPB (Autio et al, 2001;Krueger et al, 2000;van Gelderen et al, 2008;Tkachev & Kolvereid, 1999). Unlike other models, the TPB offers a coherent and generally applicable theoretical framework, which enables us to understand and predict entrepreneurial intention by taking into account not only personal but also social factors (Krueger et al, 2000).…”
Section: Theory Of Planned Behavior (Tpb) Explaining Entrepreneurial mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPB integrates two lines of research on entrepreneurial intentions: research on the relationships between attitudes and entrepreneurial intention (Douglas & Shepherd, 2002), and research on the connections between self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention (Jung, Ehrlich, DeNoble & Baik, 2001). The TPB has been used successfully in the past to describe entrepreneurial intentions of students in the U.S. (Autio, et al, 2001;Krueger, et al, 2000), The Netherlands (van Gelderen, et al, 2008), Norway (Kolvereid, 1996), Russia (Tkachev & Kolvereid, 1999), Finland, Sweden (Autio, et al, 2001), Germany (Jacob & Richter, 2005), Spain and Taiwan (Liñán & Chen, 2009;Moriano, 2005), and South Africa (Gird & Bagraim, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies had shown that entrepreneurial intentions and behavior can be influenced through education (Fayolle et al, 2006;Tkachev, Kolvereid, 1999). University is an institution which students go through on their way toward their business life.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%