2006
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Efficacy, Therapeutic Alliance, and Alcohol-Use Disorder Treatment Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been argued that the association between alliance and outcomes may be more complicated in substance abuse treatment than in mental health treatment as the reinforcing effect of the therapeutic alliance may be unable to compete with the more powerful reinforcing effect of the substance (Meier et al 2005). Within Project MATCH, a multi-site study of alcohol dependence designed to evaluate treatment-matching approaches, therapeutic alliance significantly predicted one-year alcohol-related treatment outcomes with no significant interaction by treatment type and after controlling for other sources of variance (Connors et al 1997;Ilgen et al 2006). Interestingly, although client ratings of the therapeutic alliance are typically more strongly related to treatment outcomes than therapist assessments (Horvath and Symonds 1991), in these studies, therapist ratings were more strongly related to treatment outcomes than client ratings (Ilgen et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that the association between alliance and outcomes may be more complicated in substance abuse treatment than in mental health treatment as the reinforcing effect of the therapeutic alliance may be unable to compete with the more powerful reinforcing effect of the substance (Meier et al 2005). Within Project MATCH, a multi-site study of alcohol dependence designed to evaluate treatment-matching approaches, therapeutic alliance significantly predicted one-year alcohol-related treatment outcomes with no significant interaction by treatment type and after controlling for other sources of variance (Connors et al 1997;Ilgen et al 2006). Interestingly, although client ratings of the therapeutic alliance are typically more strongly related to treatment outcomes than therapist assessments (Horvath and Symonds 1991), in these studies, therapist ratings were more strongly related to treatment outcomes than client ratings (Ilgen et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandura (1977) explains self-efficacy as personal judgments of one's capabilities to organize and execute courses of action to attain the chosen goals (for e.g., a consumer believes that she can wake up early and go to a gym regularly). The role of self-efficacy in motivating changes in consumers' attitudes and intentions has been empirically studied in many healthrelated campaigns like contraceptive behavior (McKinney, 1982), alcoholism (Ilgen et al, 2006), and self-efficacy combine to form the construct efficacy (Witte, 1992;Witte et al, 1996). Therefore,…”
Section: H1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental tenets of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986) have predicted adherence to health programs and medication regimens, as well as to academic homework and work tasks (Glanz, Rimer, & Lewis, 2002;Schunk, 2008). Specifically, individuals' confidence in their own ability to achieve a goal (i.e., their self-efficacy) is empirically established as the primary determinant of goal attainment for a wide variety of health behaviors (Bandura, 2006;Clark & Dodge, 1999;Gwaltney, Metrik, Kahler, & Shiffman, 2009;Holden, 1991;Ilgen, Tiet, Finney, & Moos, 2006;Luszczynska & Sutton, 2006;Matthew, 2004). Self-efficacy is measured by examining patient confidence to overcome perceived barriers to goal attainment (Bandura, 2001).…”
Section: Social-cognitive Determinants Of Adherencementioning
confidence: 99%