1995
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences.

Abstract: This study examined grade-and achievement-level differences in 4th-, 7th-, and lOth-grade students' control-related beliefs and relations between students' beliefs and their reading and writing achievement. MANOVA results indicated grade-and achievement-level differences in self-efficacy, causal attribution, and outcome expectancy beliefs but no interaction between grade and achievement level. Canonical correlations identified a single dimension linking students' beliefs to achievement in both reading and writ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
186
2
15

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
17
186
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of grades, it is logical that those who are from higher grades would likely to have higher achievements, that is the higher the grade-level of students, the better their comprehension achievement will be (read Shell, Bruning & Colvin, 1995;Rafhael & Au, 2005;Shanahan, 1984;Shanahan & Lomax, 1986). Although in Indonesia, school students are commonly grouped based on their age not on their ability, exposure to English and learning experience that students have received may have an impact on their academic development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of grades, it is logical that those who are from higher grades would likely to have higher achievements, that is the higher the grade-level of students, the better their comprehension achievement will be (read Shell, Bruning & Colvin, 1995;Rafhael & Au, 2005;Shanahan, 1984;Shanahan & Lomax, 1986). Although in Indonesia, school students are commonly grouped based on their age not on their ability, exposure to English and learning experience that students have received may have an impact on their academic development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of these studies have concentrated on looking at grammar efficacy indirectly as part of writing efficacy (Collins & Bissell, 2002;Pajares & Johnson, 1994;Shell et al, 1995). Only one study by Collins and Bissell (2004) has mainly centred on grammar efficacy where they examined self-efficacy among community college students in their learning of grammar in an introductory media writing course.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-efficacy is among the most notable motivational constructs educational psychologists have been examining (Lane, Lane, & Kyprianou, 2004;Pajares & Valiante, 1999;Shell, Colvin, & Bruning, 1995). Recently, researchers have investigated how self-efficacy is related to goal orientation, another notable motivational construct (Liem, Lau, & Nie, 2007;Phan, 2009Phan, , 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%