2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icriis.2013.6716721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-efficacy and its impacts on academic researchers' absorptive capacity in smart phones acceptance: Conceptual paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, smartphones is viewed as a substantial communication tool [5,10]. Thus, the smartphones have become an integral part of many societies [8].…”
Section: 2smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nowadays, smartphones is viewed as a substantial communication tool [5,10]. Thus, the smartphones have become an integral part of many societies [8].…”
Section: 2smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the smartphones have become an integral part of many societies [8]. Therefore, extensive studies emphasized on the importance of smartphones in individuals' daily life [5,[11][12]. Various studies show that smartphones play a major role in facilitation an individual's tasks.…”
Section: 2smartphonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recent advancement in technologies change the way of how academic researchers carries the research activities. Academic researchers' awareness and actual usage of the recent technologies will improve the productivity of their research outputs (Bamasoud, Iahad, & Rahman, 2013). Pasupathy and Siwatu (2013) and Lucas and Murry (2007) emphasize the necessity of productivity in research in higher education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucas and Murry (2007) stated that enhancing the research through the recent technologies become a debate for researchers and practitioners. However, the factors affecting academic researchers' adoption of such technologies are poorly understood (Bamasoud et al, 2013;Pearce, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%