2016
DOI: 10.9790/6737-03044548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-efficacy, Achievement motivation and Anxietyof Elite Athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This profile would involve high levels of factor 1 variable (performance enhancing variables; motivation, mood, rest, concentration, selfconfidence and team cohesion); together with low levels of factor 2 variables (performance limiting variables: cognitive anxiety, stress and general arousal). These results would be in line with those described by Mouloud and El-Kadder (2016), who after conducting a bibliographic review in relation to the psychological characteristics of elite athletes, found that performance was enhanced when athletes present high levels of self-efficacy (selfconfidence) and motivation, and low levels of cognitive anxiety.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This profile would involve high levels of factor 1 variable (performance enhancing variables; motivation, mood, rest, concentration, selfconfidence and team cohesion); together with low levels of factor 2 variables (performance limiting variables: cognitive anxiety, stress and general arousal). These results would be in line with those described by Mouloud and El-Kadder (2016), who after conducting a bibliographic review in relation to the psychological characteristics of elite athletes, found that performance was enhanced when athletes present high levels of self-efficacy (selfconfidence) and motivation, and low levels of cognitive anxiety.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our ambiguous findings regarding the negative prediction from somatic trait anxiety on somatic state anxiety are surprising and somewhat contradict the theoretical competitive anxiety trait‐state relationship, as low trait concentration disruption performers perceive state responses as more facilitating than their high trait counterparts 13 . The relationship between trait and state anxiety is not always straightforward as state anxiety is also influenced by the situation 31 . However, our cross‐sectional design combined with our relatively small sample size might also be an explanation for this.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…13 The relationship between trait and state anxiety is not always straightforward as state anxiety is also influenced by the situation. 31 However, our cross-sectional design combined with our relatively small sample size might also be an explanation for this. However, our findings contribute nevertheless to the limited number of studies in elite female football, underlining that worry trait anxiety has a positive significant prediction on somatic state anxiety.…”
Section: Second Part-psychological Characteristics Age and National T...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The presented results correspond with other studies, where participants express higher GES scores, while also being less mentally devastated after failures, which in turn, could correspond with the long-term practice fortitude. Such a mental attitude of ignoring failure, or the ability to withstand certain mental pressure connected with failure, is connected with a higher selfefficacy level or the winner-type personality [26]. Belief in one's own performance could be one of the indicators for the sense of self-esteem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%