2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-021-10279-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-discrepancy as a Predictor of Eating Disorder Symptoms: Findings from Two Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies of Adults with Binge Eating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Completing event-based surveys relies on self-initiation by caregivers, thus, there may be occasions when caregivers forget to report children’s food requests or consumption. To ensure these feeding interactions are captured, each EMA survey ends with the option to report an occasion where children have asked for, or consumed food, that caregivers have not previously reported, as done in other EMA research [ 23 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completing event-based surveys relies on self-initiation by caregivers, thus, there may be occasions when caregivers forget to report children’s food requests or consumption. To ensure these feeding interactions are captured, each EMA survey ends with the option to report an occasion where children have asked for, or consumed food, that caregivers have not previously reported, as done in other EMA research [ 23 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on this model, Trompeter et al (2021) suggest that an inability to regulate negative emotions and over‐evaluation of shape and weight may be core to the development and maintenance of disordered eating behaviors. Relatedly, scholars have argued that self‐discrepancies and appearance‐related self‐discrepancies between one's actual, ideal, and ought self can contribute to negative affective states and consequent disordered eating psychopathology (e.g., Lantz et al, 2018; Mason et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%