2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00420-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Moderating role of online moral foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, users eventually exchange messages which compel them to disclose and elaborate more information about themselvesa clear indicator how self-disclosure influences trust through acts of reciprocity and vulnerability. This study likewise confirms the influence of self-disclosure on intimacy similar to the findings of the previous literature (Desjarlais and Joseph, 2017;Lin and Utz, 2017;Ogba et al, 2019). Findings also reveal that the manner of user-to-user self-disclosure fosters close interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, users eventually exchange messages which compel them to disclose and elaborate more information about themselvesa clear indicator how self-disclosure influences trust through acts of reciprocity and vulnerability. This study likewise confirms the influence of self-disclosure on intimacy similar to the findings of the previous literature (Desjarlais and Joseph, 2017;Lin and Utz, 2017;Ogba et al, 2019). Findings also reveal that the manner of user-to-user self-disclosure fosters close interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Visual images and selfinformation frequently shared online were also seen to foster a level of familiarity, closeness and online intimacy among users (Houghton et al, 2018;Lin and Utz, 2017). The depth of online selfdisclosure was likewise associated in developing intimacies as friendship quality was enhanced because openly sharing personal and intimate information among users trigger feelings of closeness toward each other (Desjarlais and Joseph, 2017;Ogba et al, 2019). However, Pang (2018) found no relationship between self-disclosure and intimacy and friendship closeness in a study conducted on WeChat.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies had illustrated that feelings of insecurity were related to more alexithymia [ 42 , 43 ], which refers to individuals who avoid close interpersonal relationships and keep distant from others socially [ 44 ], and thus individuals with high levels of insecurity resist self-disclosure [ 29 ]. Self-disclosure is helpful for individuals to strengthen their bond and intimacy with others [ 45 ], and thus increase the social cohesion of communities [ 46 , 47 ], this may activate communal coping [ 48 ], finally relieving posttraumatic psychological distress [ 27 ]. However, once the individual being resistant to disclosure, then they did not form effective coping, and finally might lead to more PTSSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CI reported for the BSEs are bias corrected (BC) bootstrapped CIs based on 5000 samples. The Hayes PROCESS is currently the most acceptable method in tests of moderation in psychological research (see Ogba et al, 2019;Chukwuorji et al, 2018;Aydogmus et al, 2017). If a product term (that is, interaction of predictor and moderator) was significant, it would mean that the association between the relationship variable (e.g., entrapment) and the criterion variable (problem gambling) was either stronger or weaker in the presence of the moderator (impulsivity).…”
Section: Data Preparation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%