2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-directed orofacial grooming promotes social attraction in mice via chemosensory communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 h and 4h ). Since blue light activation of OT D3 neurons induces grooming 43 , 57 , it potentially influences behavioral measurements, including underestimation of the immobility time in the FST and TST. We rectified potential grooming-related deviations under light stimulation (detailed in Methods) and similar conclusions could be drawn (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 h and 4h ). Since blue light activation of OT D3 neurons induces grooming 43 , 57 , it potentially influences behavioral measurements, including underestimation of the immobility time in the FST and TST. We rectified potential grooming-related deviations under light stimulation (detailed in Methods) and similar conclusions could be drawn (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open-field test is the most reliable indicator of emotionality in rodents. Self-grooming is an important behavior observed in rodents, primarily to maintain body hygiene, thermoregulation, chemocommunication, and stress reduction [ 67 ]. Chronic restraint stress, which has been well documented [ 68 ], is known to disrupt emotional activities, aligning with the findings of our study that emotional activities are significantly reduced in SIS rats compared to SG rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social interaction might be assessed in a couple of freely moving animals, placed in a simple or enriched context [ 12 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Alternatively, “guest” animals might be fixed with tether and collar assemblies [ 30 , 32 ], separated in a compartment of the test arena [ 33 , 34 , 35 ], or encaged [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The social stimuli might be isolated by partitions, which specifically limit or restrict visual, audial, haptic, or olfactory sensory inputs involved in animal interactions [ 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%