1955
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(55)90074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-diffusion of lead in oriented grain-boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, in these thermo mechanical conditions change the amplitude of vibration of the atoms and their frequency due to the amount of vibration energy absorbed and related with the variety of disorders occurring during such irreversible deformation process [3,[8][9]. The activation energy values reported in this work, there are in a very closed agreement with the activation energy of 65.7 kJ/mol for grain boundary diffusion reported previously by Okkerse [10], and also with the values of 45 -75 kJ/mol reported by Avery and Stuarts for superplastic flow in the Pb-Sn eutectic alloy [11]. In the same way with the activation energy value of 56.9 kJ/mol, reported by Mohamed and Langdon [12] by a using a conventional methodology [13][14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Consequently, in these thermo mechanical conditions change the amplitude of vibration of the atoms and their frequency due to the amount of vibration energy absorbed and related with the variety of disorders occurring during such irreversible deformation process [3,[8][9]. The activation energy values reported in this work, there are in a very closed agreement with the activation energy of 65.7 kJ/mol for grain boundary diffusion reported previously by Okkerse [10], and also with the values of 45 -75 kJ/mol reported by Avery and Stuarts for superplastic flow in the Pb-Sn eutectic alloy [11]. In the same way with the activation energy value of 56.9 kJ/mol, reported by Mohamed and Langdon [12] by a using a conventional methodology [13][14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The testing temperatures in this work are in the range of 0.57-0.67 T m , which are lower than the temperatures used by other research groups [13,23] in their creep study of Pb. For high punching stresses and I = 0 A, the activation energy for the rate process is 63.5 kJ/mol, compatible to the activation energy of 65.6 kJ/mol for grain boundary diffusion in Pb [26]. This result suggests that the grain boundary sliding is likely the dominant rate process for the impression creep of Pb at high punching stresses.…”
Section: Apparent Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In the case of the glass model advocated here, l would be simply 2 6 since there is no core. Since DB is considerably larger than D, (e. g. D,/D, = 6.6 X 103 for lead at its melting point [IO], [20]) this permits simplification to the form which is of course again reminiscent of the Stokes-Einstein and Nabarro-Herring equations, except for the final stress-dependent term. Regarding the latter, one notes that in metals r is usually of the order of 100 ergs cm-2 while l in the present model is of the order of 2 X 10-7 cm.…”
Section: Superplasticity Of Certain Alloy Polycrys-tals Diffusion-acmentioning
confidence: 99%