Self-cutting versus intentional overdose: Psychological risk factors

Larkin, Celine; Blasi, Zelda Di; Arensman, Ella

doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.04.001

Cited by 7 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies involved longitudinal designs (Cha et al, 2010;Larkin et al, 2013;Nock et al, 2010;Pluck et al, 2013), one study used a case-control design (Dougherty et al, 2004) and two studies were cross-sectional (Mathias et al, 2011;Swann et al, 2005).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study included only adolescents (Mathias et al, 2011) with all other studies including just adults. In terms of patient recruitment, one study recruited participants from the community only (Dougherty et al, 2004), three studies recruited patients from emergency departments (Cha et al, 2010;Larkin et al, 2013;Nock et al, 2010), one study recruited community patients / psychiatric outpatients and inpatients (Pluck et al, 2013), and the remainder recruited only psychiatric inpatients.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cognitive control was assessed by: (Cha et al, 2010;Larkin et al, 2013)  Go/No-Go test (Mathias et al, 2011;Pluck et al, 2013)  Continuous Performance Test -all versions (CPT) (Dougherty et al, 2004;Pluck et al, 2013;Swann et al, 2005)  Trail Making Test (TMT) (Pluck et al, 2013)  Implicit Associations Test (IAT) …”

Section: Exposurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the four longitudinal studies, three assessed repetition of self-harm or suicide attempts over follow-up (Cha et al, 2010;Larkin et al, 2013;Nock et al, 2010;Pluck et al, 2013). Therefore, all four of these studies provided prospective data for objective 2 ("repeaters vs. non-repeaters" or "current + past vs. past only).…”

Section: Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies were conducted in Western countries: three in the United States (Goldston et al, 2001;Hughes and Neimeyer, 1993;Kehrer and Linehan, 1996), two in the UK (Hawton et al, 1999;Oldershaw et al, 2009), two in Ireland (Larkin et al, 2013;McAuliffe et al, 2008) and one in Norway (Dieserud et al, 2003). Three studies included only adolescents (Goldston et al, 2001;Hawton et al, 1999;Oldershaw et al, 2009) with the remainder adults.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Are neurocognitive factors associated with repetition of self-harm? A systematic review

Cates

Rees

Jollant

et al. 2017

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Prediction of self-harm is limited clinically. Early identification of individuals likely to repeat self-harm could improve outcomes and reduce suicide risk. Various neurocognitive deficits have been found in people who self-harm, but the ability of these to predict repetition has yet to be established Aims:Identify neurocognitive factors that may predict repetition of self-harm. Methods:Systematic narrative review of English language publications assessing neurocognitive functioning and self-harm repetition, searching multiple databases from inception to March 2015. Quality of studies was appraised. A narrative synthesis was performed. Results:7026 unique records were identified, and 169 full-texts assessed. 15 unique studies provided data. No imaging studies could be included. Most studies assessed cognitive control or problem solving, but neither factor was consistently associated with repetition. However, specific tasks may show promise. Two studies in adolescents suggest that value-based decision-making impairments could be predictive of repetition. There were too few results for memory to draw specific conclusions. Conclusions:Selected studies suggest promise for particular neurocognitive factors and specific cognitive tasks in terms of repetition of self-harm.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exposurementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Are neurocognitive factors associated with repetition of self-harm? A systematic review

Cates

Rees

Jollant

et al. 2017

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The exacerbating influence of hopelessness on other known risk factors for repeat self-harm and suicide

Steeg

Haigh

Webb

et al. 2016

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(2016) The exacerbating influence of hopelessness on other known risk factors for repeat self-harm and suicide. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190. pp. 522-528. ISSN 1573-2517 Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University's research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher's website (a subscription may be required.)Author's Accepted Manuscript This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

A comparison of methods of self-harm without intent to die: Cutting versus self-poisoning

Chartrand

Kim

Sareen

et al. 2016

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-cutting versus intentional overdose: Psychological risk factors

Cited by 7 publications

References 47 publications

Are neurocognitive factors associated with repetition of self-harm? A systematic review

Are neurocognitive factors associated with repetition of self-harm? A systematic review

The exacerbating influence of hopelessness on other known risk factors for repeat self-harm and suicide

A comparison of methods of self-harm without intent to die: Cutting versus self-poisoning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About