2019
DOI: 10.1109/jqe.2019.2918935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Correction Limits in Dual-Comb Interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our approach opens up new prospects for further developments. By means of active stabilization or self-correction algorithms [44], averaging times far beyond one second could be achieved. The implementation of comb generators with several stages could lead to expand the attainable optical bandwidth or, alternatively, to densify the generated spectra [45,46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our approach opens up new prospects for further developments. By means of active stabilization or self-correction algorithms [44], averaging times far beyond one second could be achieved. The implementation of comb generators with several stages could lead to expand the attainable optical bandwidth or, alternatively, to densify the generated spectra [45,46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 40–42 ] A prerequisite for such algorithms to enable mode‐resolved dual‐comb measurements is the Nyquist criterion: the relative frequency between the two combs cannot fluctuate by more than half of the repetition rate difference within the duration of a single dual‐comb IFG. [ 43 ] In other words, as long as frequency‐noisy dual‐comb lines drift by less than half the spacing between the lines from IFG shot to shot, they can be digitally shifted back to their original position. Unfortunately, larger frequency excursions cannot be tracked because they become aliased—the frequency drift is much higher than accurately measurable during a single IFG period.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Free‐running Dual‐comb Lasermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is effective and low-cost, yet the tuning flexibility, stability, and robustness are still deficient compared to separate dual-comb configuration, which limits the hand-off running time and potential industrial perspective. The second branch recovered the mutual coherence via synchronous locking [ 33 ], adaptive sampling [ 34 , 35 ], real-time digital error correction [ 36 ], or self-referenced post-processing algorithm [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Among these methods, the self-referenced post-processing algorithm eliminates the CW reference and additional heterodyne interferometer, achieving the highest cost-effective for Doppler-limited spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, the self-referenced post-processing algorithm eliminates the CW reference and additional heterodyne interferometer, achieving the highest cost-effective for Doppler-limited spectroscopy. However, most self-corrected algorithms aim at correcting interferograms (IGMs) in the time domain, requiring relatively complicated calculation steps and rigorous limitations [ 39 ]. In fact, for actual spectroscopic applications such as gas detection, these time-domain correction processes are not necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%