2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/722/1/412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Convergence of Radiatively Cooling Clumps in the Interstellar Medium

Abstract: Isolated regions of higher density populate the ISM on all scales -from molecular clouds, to the star-forming regions known as cores, to heterogeneous ejecta found near planetary nebulae and supernova remnants. These clumps interact with winds and shocks from nearby energetic sources. Understanding the interactions of shocked clumps is vital to our understanding of the composition, morphology, and evolution of the ISM. The evolution of shocked clumps are wellunderstood in the limiting "adiabatic" case where ph… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yirak et al (2010), however, pointed out the need to resolve the cooling length l cool in radiative shock-cloud interactions and criticized some earlier studies (Mellema et al 2002;Fragile et al 2004) with strong cooling for being highly underresolved in this regard, leading to reduced cooling and dampened RT and KH instabilities as a consequence thereof. Although this problem is mitigated by our different set of parameter values (e.g., much smaller cloud), due to computational constraints, we are still forced to tolerate a somewhat underresolved cooling length of 0.64 cell widths.…”
Section: Resolution Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yirak et al (2010), however, pointed out the need to resolve the cooling length l cool in radiative shock-cloud interactions and criticized some earlier studies (Mellema et al 2002;Fragile et al 2004) with strong cooling for being highly underresolved in this regard, leading to reduced cooling and dampened RT and KH instabilities as a consequence thereof. Although this problem is mitigated by our different set of parameter values (e.g., much smaller cloud), due to computational constraints, we are still forced to tolerate a somewhat underresolved cooling length of 0.64 cell widths.…”
Section: Resolution Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiative cooling has only been incorporated more recently 2 (e.g., Mellema et al 2002;Fragile et al 2004;Orlando et al 2005Orlando et al , 2008Yirak et al 2010;van Loo et al 2007van Loo et al , 2010. Radiative cooling can change the interaction drastically by removing thermal energy and pressure from the shocked cloud material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klein et al 1994;Nakamura et al 2006), with more complex cases requiring even higher resolutions (e.g. Yirak et al 2010). However, it is very computationally expensive to run 3D simulations to such high resolutions.…”
Section: Convergence Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mac Low et al 1994;Shin-S., Stone & Snyder 2008), radiative cooling (e.g. Mellema, Kurk & Röttgering 2002;Fragile et al 2004;Yirak, Frank & Cunningham 2010) and thermal conduction (e.g. Orlando et al 2005Orlando et al , 2008.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a handful of multiple clump studies have been published (Fragile et al 2004;Yirak et al 2008). Because 3-D simulation studies are often resolution limited (Yirak et al 2011) laboratory studies can offer relatively clean platforms for deeper exploration of shock-clump interactions. A robust literature reporting a host of shock-clump high energy density laboratory astrophysics (HEDLA) studies has emerged over the last decade.…”
Section: Cosmic Ray Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%