2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40732-014-0038-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Control and Impulsiveness in Adult Humans: Comparison of Qualitatively Different Consumable Reinforcers Using a New Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there have been inconsistent findings across studies, likely due in part to variability in characteristics of the task. Specifically, delay discounting is influenced by reward magnitude (Myerson & Green, 1995), delay length, type of reward (e.g., monetary versus non-monetary) (Chapman & Elstein, 1995; Demurie, Roeyers, Baeyens, & Sonuga-Barke, 2013; Friedel, DeHart, Madden, & Odum, 2014; Killeen, 2015), and whether the rewards are immediately consumable (e.g., food versus money) (Forzano, Michels, Sorama, Etopio, & English, 2014). We recently found ADHD-associated increases in delay discounting to be specific to girls and specific to a novel real-time discounting task involving immediately consumable rewards, but not a classic monetary discounting task, suggesting that inconsistent findings across studies may also be due to task differences or individual characteristics such as sex (Rosch & Mostofsky, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been inconsistent findings across studies, likely due in part to variability in characteristics of the task. Specifically, delay discounting is influenced by reward magnitude (Myerson & Green, 1995), delay length, type of reward (e.g., monetary versus non-monetary) (Chapman & Elstein, 1995; Demurie, Roeyers, Baeyens, & Sonuga-Barke, 2013; Friedel, DeHart, Madden, & Odum, 2014; Killeen, 2015), and whether the rewards are immediately consumable (e.g., food versus money) (Forzano, Michels, Sorama, Etopio, & English, 2014). We recently found ADHD-associated increases in delay discounting to be specific to girls and specific to a novel real-time discounting task involving immediately consumable rewards, but not a classic monetary discounting task, suggesting that inconsistent findings across studies may also be due to task differences or individual characteristics such as sex (Rosch & Mostofsky, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of impulsiveness strongly contrasts with that of self‐control, as the latter is characterized by “the choice of a larger, more delayed reinforcer over a smaller, less delayed reinforce,” while impulsiveness is the exact opposite (Forzano et al, 2014, p. 719). The opposition between desire and willpower is in fact essential to the concept of self‐control (Hoch & Loewenstein, 1991), since the latter serves to obstruct instant preferences in favor of long‐term ones (Wertenbroch, 1998).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenhow, Hunt, Macaskill, and Harper (2015) used Visual Basic to create a computer game in which participants navigated a skier down a slope, periodically making choices between a brief jump for a few points and a longer jump for more points. Forzano, Michels, Sorama, Etopio, and English (2014) created discounting tasks in which participants made choices between smaller, sooner and larger, later opportunities to drink juice or watch video clips of cartoons. Paglieri, Addessi, Sbaffi, Tasselli, and Delfino (2015) created a task in which participants chose between smaller numbers of blueberries or crackers immediately or larger numbers after a delay by clicking on image of the food on a computer screen (see also Kangas & Hackenberg, 2009 for a discussion of in-task reinforcers).…”
Section: Case Example In Arranging Outcomes Within Experimental Analo...mentioning
confidence: 99%