2009
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2009.0384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistent mean-field magnetohydrodynamics

Abstract: We consider the linear stability of two-dimensional nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic basic states to long-wavelength three-dimensional perturbations. Following Hughes & Proctor (Hughes & Proctor 2009 Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 1599-1616 (doi:10.1098/rspa.2008.0493)), the two-dimensional basic states are obtained from a specific forcing function in the presence of an initially uniform mean field of strength B. By extending to the nonlinear regime the kinematic analysis of Roberts (Roberts 1970 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results restricted to kinematic MHD have also been obtained in Vladimirov (2010) and Herreman and Lesaffre (2011). There remains the challenge of developing a self-consistent theory of the full MHD equations (Moffatt 1978), which may be viewed as a complementary approach to that of Courvoisier et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Similar results restricted to kinematic MHD have also been obtained in Vladimirov (2010) and Herreman and Lesaffre (2011). There remains the challenge of developing a self-consistent theory of the full MHD equations (Moffatt 1978), which may be viewed as a complementary approach to that of Courvoisier et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In other words, our simulations do not posses a kinematic stage in which the influence of B would be negligible. The applicability of QKTF to such a situation has been questioned by Courvoisier et al (2010). We emphasize, however, that Eq.…”
Section: Calculation Of Turbulent Transport Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Turbulent viscosity is by far not the only contribution to the Reynolds stress tensor. In addition to hydrodynamic contributions such as the Λ effect (Rüdiger 1980(Rüdiger , 1989, which is relevant to explaining stellar differential rotation (Rüdiger & Hollerbach 2004), and the anisotropic kinetic alpha effect (Frisch et al 1987), which provides an important test case in mean-field hydrodynamics (Brandenburg & von Rekowski 2001;Courvoisier et al 2010), there are magnetic contributions as well. One can think of them as a magnetic feedback on the hydrodynamic stress tensor (Rädler 1974;Rüdiger 1974) or, especially when magnetic fluctuations are also considered, as a mean-field contribution to the turbulent Lorentz force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%