2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistent Black Hole Accretion Spectral Models and the Forgotten Role of Coronal Comptonization of Reflection Emission

Abstract: Continuum and reflection spectral models have each been widely employed in measuring the spins of accreting black holes. However, the two approaches have not been implemented together in a photon-conserving, selfconsistent framework. We develop such a framework using the black hole X-ray binary GX339-4 as a touchstone source, and we demonstrate three important ramifications.(1) Compton scattering of reflection emission in the corona is routinely ignored, but is an essential consideration given that reflection… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the hard state, Meyer et al (2000) had predicted that thermal conduction of heat from the corona will cause the inner disk to evaporate, leading to an optically thick and geometrically thin disk, that is truncated at some significant distance away from the black hole. While there is evidence for truncation during the hard state (Mahmoud et al 2019), and at luminosities below 0.1% of the Eddington limit (L Edd ) for GX 339-4 (Tomsick et al 2009), measurements of the reflection component in the bright hard state (> 5% L Edd ) have lead to estimates of inner radii very close to the ISCO for several sources, including GX 339-4 (García et al 2015;Steiner et al 2017;Wang-Ji et al 2018;García et al 2019). While there exists abundant evidence for truncated disk at low/hard state, and the disk extending until ISCO by the time the source reaches bright soft state (Gierliński & Done 2004;Steiner et al 2010;Penna et al 2010;Zhu et al 2012), the evolution of the disk and the coronal parameters, especially the inner disk's radius during the bright intermediate states is not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the hard state, Meyer et al (2000) had predicted that thermal conduction of heat from the corona will cause the inner disk to evaporate, leading to an optically thick and geometrically thin disk, that is truncated at some significant distance away from the black hole. While there is evidence for truncation during the hard state (Mahmoud et al 2019), and at luminosities below 0.1% of the Eddington limit (L Edd ) for GX 339-4 (Tomsick et al 2009), measurements of the reflection component in the bright hard state (> 5% L Edd ) have lead to estimates of inner radii very close to the ISCO for several sources, including GX 339-4 (García et al 2015;Steiner et al 2017;Wang-Ji et al 2018;García et al 2019). While there exists abundant evidence for truncated disk at low/hard state, and the disk extending until ISCO by the time the source reaches bright soft state (Gierliński & Done 2004;Steiner et al 2010;Penna et al 2010;Zhu et al 2012), the evolution of the disk and the coronal parameters, especially the inner disk's radius during the bright intermediate states is not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model simplcut (Steiner et al 2017) is a variant of the model simpl (Steiner et al 2009), and functions as a coronal plasma, inverse-Compton (IC) scattering the disk photons in a convolution kernel. The simplcut model includes a coronal electron temperature (kT e ) and thus contains a high-energy cutoff in the power-law continuum.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has four physical parameters: the scattered fraction f sc , the spectral index Γ, the electron temperature kT e , and the reflection fraction R f . We follow the procedures in Steiner et al (2017), but we do not implement any linking between the diskbb parameters in the hard and soft states. In XSPEC notation, the model we adopt is constant * Tbabs * [simplcut * (diskbb+relxillCp) +xillverCp] (2015-M2).…”
Section: Model 2: Taking the Comptonization Of Reflection Into Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%